Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25333358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Promoting utilization of Saccharum spp. genetic resources through genetic diversity analysis and core collection construction.

Spurthi N Nayak, Jian Song, Andrea Villa, Bhuvan Pathak, Tomas Ayala-Silva, Xiping Yang, James Todd, Neil C Glynn, David N Kuhn, Barry Glaz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic diversity of3 Biotech · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Spurthi N NayakAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Jian SongAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America; College of Life Sciences, Dezhou University, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Andrea VillaAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Bhuvan PathakAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Tomas Ayala-SilvaSubtropical Horticulture Research Station, USDA-ARS, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Xiping YangAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
James ToddEverglades Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Belle Glade, Florida, United States of America.
Neil C GlynnSugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, Florida, United States of America.
David N KuhnSubtropical Horticulture Research Station, USDA-ARS, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Barry GlazSugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, Florida, United States of America.
Robert A GilbertAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Jack C ComstockSugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, Florida, United States of America.
Jianping WangAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America; Genetics Institute, Plant Molecular and Biology Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America; FAFU and UIUC-SIB Joint Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) and other members of Saccharum spp. are attractive biofuel feedstocks. One of the two World Collections of Sugarcane and Related Grasses (WCSRG) is in Miami, FL. This WCSRG has 1002 accessions, presumably with valuable alleles for biomass, other important agronomic traits, and stress resistance. However, the WCSRG has not been fully exploited by breeders due to its lack of characterization and unmanageable population. In order to optimize the use of this genetic resource, we aim to 1) genotypically evaluate all the 1002 accessions to understand its genetic diversity and population structure and 2) form a core collection, which captures most of the genetic diversity in the WCSRG. We screened 36 microsatellite markers on 1002 genotypes and recorded 209 alleles. Genetic diversity of the WCSRG ranged from 0 to 0.5 with an average of 0.304. The population structure analysis and principal coordinate analysis revealed three clusters with all S. spontaneum in one cluster, S. officinarum and S. hybrids in the second cluster and mostly non-Saccharum spp. in the third cluster. A core collection of 300 accessions was identified which captured the maximum genetic diversity of the entire WCSRG which can be further exploited for sugarcane and energy cane breeding. Sugarcane and energy cane breeders can effectively utilize this core collection for cultivar improvement. Further, the core collection can provide resources for forming an association panel to evaluate the traits of agronomic and commercial importance.

Indexed as

BreedingGenetic VariationAllelesBiofuelsBiomassGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypeSaccharumSpecies SpecificityBiofuels

Identifiers

PMID25333358
PMCPMC4205016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.