ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2014
Aerosol bolus dispersion in healthy and asthmatic children-theoretical and experimental results.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Theoretical diagnosis of emphysema by aerosol bolus inhalation.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Local lung deposition of ultrafine particles in healthy adults: experimental results and theoretical predictions.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the past decades, aerosol bolus inhalation increasingly came into the focus of medical interest due to its potential as a non-invasive technique for the diagnosis of lung diseases. The experimental studies were accompanied by the development of theoretical contributions dealing with aerosol bolus behaviour in healthy and diseased lungs. In this study, bolus dispersion in healthy and asthmatic children is subject to a theoretical approach. Model predictions are validated with related experimental findings.
methodsAerosol bolus transport was simulated by using (I) a stochastic model of the human respiratory tract; (II) appropriate scaling procedures for the generation of healthy and asthmatic lungs of children; and (III) the concept of effective diffusivities (Deff) for the prediction of convective mixing processes in the conducting airways and alveoli. The aerosol injected into the inhalative air stream consisted of monodisperse particles with a diameter of 0.4 µm (ρ =1 g∙cm(-3)). Volumetric lung depth, being a measure for the position of the aerosol bolus within the inspired air stream, was varied from 95 mL (shallow bolus) to 540 mL (deep bolus). Half-width of the inhaled bolus was set to 50 mL.
resultsAccording to the predictions provided by the model, dispersion of the exhaled aerosol bolus increases exponentially with volumetric lung depth in both asthmatic children and healthy controls. Asthmatics tend to develop higher bolus dispersion than healthy subjects, with significant differences between the two groups being noticeable at low volumetric lung depths (<300 mL). Skewness decreases with increasing volumetric lung depth, whereby respective values calculated for asthmatics exceed those values computed for healthy subjects. Theoretical results correspond very well with experimental findings. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsResults of experimental bolus studies may be approximated by theoretical models with high accuracy. Model predictions confirm the assumption that inhalation of aerosol boluses and dispersion measurements have only a limited diagnostic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.