Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25333022›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2014

Aerosol bolus dispersion in healthy and asthmatic children-theoretical and experimental results.

Robert Sturm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert SturmBrunnleitenweg 41, A-5061 Elsbethen, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the past decades, aerosol bolus inhalation increasingly came into the focus of medical interest due to its potential as a non-invasive technique for the diagnosis of lung diseases. The experimental studies were accompanied by the development of theoretical contributions dealing with aerosol bolus behaviour in healthy and diseased lungs. In this study, bolus dispersion in healthy and asthmatic children is subject to a theoretical approach. Model predictions are validated with related experimental findings.

methodsAerosol bolus transport was simulated by using (I) a stochastic model of the human respiratory tract; (II) appropriate scaling procedures for the generation of healthy and asthmatic lungs of children; and (III) the concept of effective diffusivities (Deff) for the prediction of convective mixing processes in the conducting airways and alveoli. The aerosol injected into the inhalative air stream consisted of monodisperse particles with a diameter of 0.4 µm (ρ =1 g∙cm(-3)). Volumetric lung depth, being a measure for the position of the aerosol bolus within the inspired air stream, was varied from 95 mL (shallow bolus) to 540 mL (deep bolus). Half-width of the inhaled bolus was set to 50 mL.

resultsAccording to the predictions provided by the model, dispersion of the exhaled aerosol bolus increases exponentially with volumetric lung depth in both asthmatic children and healthy controls. Asthmatics tend to develop higher bolus dispersion than healthy subjects, with significant differences between the two groups being noticeable at low volumetric lung depths (<300 mL). Skewness decreases with increasing volumetric lung depth, whereby respective values calculated for asthmatics exceed those values computed for healthy subjects. Theoretical results correspond very well with experimental findings. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsResults of experimental bolus studies may be approximated by theoretical models with high accuracy. Model predictions confirm the assumption that inhalation of aerosol boluses and dispersion measurements have only a limited diagnostic potential.

Indexed as

Aerosol bolusasthmaconvective mixingeffective diffusivitystochastic lung

Identifiers

PMID25333022
PMCPMC4200686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.