ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2014
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anterior versus posterior peroral endoscopic myotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial from a Thai tertiary center.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Timed barium esophagography to predict recurrent achalasia after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective study in Thailand.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of using a short tunnel versus a standard tunnel for peroral endoscopic myotomy for Ling type IIc and III achalasia: a retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Gentamicin submucosal lavage during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a retrospective analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first over 100 patients with short-term follow-up.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Factors predicting the technical difficulty of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Esophageal motility after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.Journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Submucosal tunnel endoscopy: Peroral endoscopic myotomy and peroral endoscopic tumor resection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016Review
- Efficiency of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric surgical practice.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2015Review
- Endoscopic procedures developed in Japan.Annals of translational medicine · 2014Article
- Graded pneumatic dilation in subtype I and II achalasia: long-term experience in a single center.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is one of the alternative treatment for achalasia. Due to concept of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), it becomes popular and widely accepted. With the endoluminal technique, submucosal tunnel was created followed by endoscopic myotomy. POEM is not only indicated in classical achalasia but also other abnormal esophageal motility disorders. Moreover, failures of endoscopic treatment or surgical attempted cases are not contraindicated for POEM. The second attempted POEM is also safe and technically feasible. Even though the legend of success of POEM is fruitful, the possible complications are very frightened. Good training and delicate practice will reduce rate of complications. This review provides a summary of current state-of-the-art of POEM, including indication equipments, technique and complications. This perfect procedure may become the treatment of choice of achalasia and some esophageal motility disorders in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.