Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25332883›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

Screening and characterization of extracellular polysaccharides produced by Leuconostoc kimchii isolated from traditional fermented pulque beverage.

Ingrid Torres-Rodríguez, María Elena Rodríguez-Alegría, Alfonso Miranda-Molina, Martha Giles-Gómez, Rodrigo Conca Morales, Agustín López-Munguía, Francisco Bolívar, Adelfo Escalante

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extracellular polysaccharides produced by bacteria of the Leuconostoc genus.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolution of Fructans inFrontiers in nutrition · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid Torres-RodríguezDepartamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av. Universidad 2001. Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca Morelos, 62210 México.
María Elena Rodríguez-AlegríaDepartamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av. Universidad 2001. Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca Morelos, 62210 México.
Alfonso Miranda-MolinaDepartamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av. Universidad 2001. Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca Morelos, 62210 México.
Martha Giles-GómezDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Química, UNAM. Ciudad Universitaria, México D. F, Coyoacán, 04510 México.
Rodrigo Conca MoralesDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Química, UNAM. Ciudad Universitaria, México D. F, Coyoacán, 04510 México.
Agustín López-MunguíaDepartamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av. Universidad 2001. Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca Morelos, 62210 México.
Francisco BolívarDepartamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av. Universidad 2001. Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca Morelos, 62210 México.
Adelfo EscalanteDepartamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av. Universidad 2001. Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca Morelos, 62210 México.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the screening and characterization of EPS produced by LAB identified as Leuconostoc kimchii isolated from pulque, a traditional Mexican fermented, non-distilled alcoholic beverage produced by the fermentation of the sap extracted from several (Agave) maguey species. EPS-producing LAB constitutes an abundant bacterial group relative to total LAB present in sap and during fermentation, however, only two EPS-producing colony phenotypes (EPSA and EPSB, respectively) were detected and isolated concluding that despite the high number of polymer-producing LAB their phenotypic diversity is low. Scanning electron microcopy analysis during EPS-producing conditions revealed that both types of EPS form a uniform porous structure surrounding the bacterial cells. The structural characterization of the soluble and cell-associated EPS fractions of each polymer by enzymatic and acid hydrolysis, as by 1D- and 2D-NMR, showed that polymers produced by the soluble and cell-associated fractions of EPSA strain are dextrans consisting of a linear backbone of linked α-(1→6) Glcp in the main chain with α-(1→2) and α-(1→3)-linked branches. The polymer produced by the soluble fraction of EPSB strain was identified as a class 1 dextran with a linear backbone containing consecutive α-(1→6)-linked D-glucopyranosyl units with few α-(1→3)-linked branches, whereas the cell-associated EPS is a polymer mixture consisting of a levan composed of linear chains of (2→6)-linked β-D-fructofuranosyl residues with β-(2→6) connections, and a class 1 dextran. According to our knowledge this is the first report of dextrans and a levan including their structural characterization produced by L. kimchii isolated from a traditional fermented source.

Indexed as

DextranExopolysaccharidesLactic acid bacteriaLeuconostoc kimchiiLevanPulque

Identifiers

PMID25332883
PMCPMC4194309
OpenAlexW2171287103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.