Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25332844›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2014

Removing batch effects for prediction problems with frozen surrogate variable analysis.

Hilary S Parker, Héctor Corrada Bravo, Jeffrey T Leek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Development of anMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023
    Article
  17. RNA-Seq Study on theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hilary S ParkerDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD , USA.
Héctor Corrada BravoCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland , College Park, MD , USA.
Jeffrey T LeekDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD , USA.

Funding

Preprocessing and Analysis Tools for High-Throughput TechnologiesR01GM083084 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2007 to 2018
$4.4M
Statistical models for biological and technical variation in RNA sequencingR01GM105705 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEEK, JEFFREY T. · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
Software for the statistical analysis of microarray probe level dataR01GM103552 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IRIZARRY, RAFAEL ANGEL · 2012 to 2013
$735k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083084NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103552NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Batch effects are responsible for the failure of promising genomic prognostic signatures, major ambiguities in published genomic results, and retractions of widely-publicized findings. Batch effect corrections have been developed to remove these artifacts, but they are designed to be used in population studies. But genomic technologies are beginning to be used in clinical applications where samples are analyzed one at a time for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive applications. There are currently no batch correction methods that have been developed specifically for prediction. In this paper, we propose an new method called frozen surrogate variable analysis (fSVA) that borrows strength from a training set for individual sample batch correction. We show that fSVA improves prediction accuracy in simulations and in public genomic studies. fSVA is available as part of the sva Bioconductor package.

Indexed as

Batch effectsDatabaseGenomicsMachine learningPredictionStatisticsSurrogate variable analysis

Identifiers

PMID25332844
PMCPMC4179553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.