ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2014
Response to corticosteroids and cytotoxic drugs in a case of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome with predominantly elevated eosinophils and multiple clinical manifestations.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present case study, a 42-year-old Chinese woman fulfilling the WHO criteria for idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHES) who exhibited clinical manifestations of eosinophilic infiltration of multiple tissues including the lungs, heart, central and peripheral nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, spleen, liver and unexplained clinical findings is described. Laboratory investigations revealed the topmost white blood cell and eosinophil that were 150 × 10(9)/L and 136 × 10(9)/L (90.6 %), respectively. To our knowledge, such a large number of eosinophils has rarely been reported, and all reactive causes of hypereosinophilia were excluded. Treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy, prednisone and dexamethasone was not beneficial. The patient showed a remarkable hematological response when methylprednisolone pulse therapy was initiated when progression of respiratory symptoms occurred, but without clinical remission. The patient subsequently died. We consider that her critical organ damage and poor prognosis were related to the large number of eosinophils and delayed effective anti-eosinophilic therapy after severe organ damage occurred. This case highlights the clinical importance of methylprednisolone pulse therapy which should be initiated without delay once the diagnosis of IHES is made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.