Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25332254›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2015

Tumor marker usage and medical care costs among older early-stage breast cancer survivors.

Scott D Ramsey, N Lynn Henry, Julie R Gralow, Dana K Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, David Mummy, Rahber Thariani, David L Veenstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Circulating tumor cells in the early detection of human cancers.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Updated Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data: Enhanced Content and Applications.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2020
    Review
  14. Analysis of blood markers for early breast cancer diagnosis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Use and Costs of Disease Monitoring in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott D RamseyScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. sramsey@fhcrc.org.
N Lynn HenryScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Julie R GralowScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Dana K MirickScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
William BarlowScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ruth EtzioniScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
David MummyScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rahber TharianiScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
David L VeenstraScott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Dana K. Mirick, William Barlow, Ruth Etzioni, and David Mummy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Scott D. Ramsey, Julie R. Gralow, Rahber Thariani, and David L. Veenstra, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
University of Washington · US

Funding

SWOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D., MEYSKENS, FRANK L. · 1985 to 2014
$205.2M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Cancer Genomics - CANCERGENRC2CA148570 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RAMSEY, SCOTT D. · 2009 to 2009
$2.0M
Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Cancer Genomics - CANCERGENUC2CA148570 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RAMSEY, SCOTT D. · 2010 to 2010
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148570NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037429NCI NIH HHS UC2 CA148570NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines discourage the use of tumor marker assessment for routine surveillance in nonmetastatic breast cancer, their use in practice is uncertain. Our objective was to determine use of tumor marker tests such as carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15-3/CA 27.29 and associated Medicare costs in early-stage breast cancer survivors.

methodsBy using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare records for patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between 2001 and 2007, tumor marker usage within 2 years after diagnosis was identified by billing codes. Logistic regression models were used to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with use of tumor markers. To determine impact on costs of care, we used multivariable regression, controlling for other factors known to influence total medical costs.

resultsWe identified 39,650 eligible patients. Of these, 16,653 (42%) received at least one tumor marker assessment, averaging 5.7 tests over 2 years, with rates of use per person increasing over time. Factors significantly associated with use included age at diagnosis, diagnosis year, stage at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, geographic region, and urban/rural status. Rates of advanced imaging, but not biopsies, were significantly higher in the assessment group. Medical costs for patients who received at least one test were approximately 29% greater than costs for those who did not, adjusting for other factors.

conclusionBreast cancer tumor markers are frequently used among women with early-stage disease and are associated with an increase in both diagnostic procedures and total cost of care. A better understanding of factors driving the use of and the potential benefits and harms of surveillance-based tumor marker testing is needed.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsComorbidityFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMedicareNeoplasm StagingPopulation SurveillanceRisk FactorsSEER ProgramBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25332254
PMCPMC4279234
OpenAlexW2116988228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.