Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25331894›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Disruption of multisystem responses to stress in type 2 diabetes: investigating the dynamics of allostatic load.

Andrew Steptoe, Ruth A Hackett, Antonio I Lazzarino, Sophie Bostock, Roberto La Marca, Livia A Carvalho, Mark Hamer

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of 1% HInternational dental journal · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stress and cardiovascular disease: an update.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew SteptoeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and a.steptoe@ucl.ac.uk.
Ruth A HackettDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and.
Antonio I LazzarinoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and.
Sophie BostockDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and.
Roberto La MarcaInstitute of Psychology, University of Zurich, CH-8050 Zürich, Germany.
Livia A CarvalhoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and.
Mark HamerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and.

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/10/005/28296British Heart Foundation RG/10/05/28296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological stress-related processes are thought to contribute to the development and progression of type 2 diabetes, but the biological mechanisms involved are poorly understood. Here, we tested the notion that people with type 2 diabetes experience chronic allostatic load, manifest as dynamic disturbances in reactivity to and recovery from stress across multiple (cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, inflammatory, metabolic) biological systems, coupled with heightened experience of chronic life stress. We carried out an experimental comparison of 140 men and women aged 50-75 y with type 2 diabetes and 280 nondiabetic individuals matched on age, sex, and income. We monitored blood pressure (BP) and heart rate, salivary cortisol, plasma interleukin (IL)-6, and total cholesterol in response to standardized mental stress, and assessed salivary cortisol over the day. People with type 2 diabetes showed impaired poststress recovery in systolic and diastolic BP, heart rate and cholesterol, and blunted stress reactivity in systolic BP, cortisol, cholesterol, and IL-6. Cortisol and IL-6 concentrations were elevated, and cortisol measured over the day was higher in the type 2 diabetes group. Diabetic persons reported greater depressive and hostile symptoms and greater stress experience than did healthy controls. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by disruption of stress-related processes across multiple biological systems and increased exposure to life stress. Chronic allostatic load provides a unifying perspective with implications for etiology and patient management.

Indexed as

AllostasisStress, PhysiologicalAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHeart RateHumansHydrocortisoneInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedHydrocortisoneIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6cardiovasculardepressioninflammationmetabolicneuroendocrine

Identifiers

PMID25331894
PMCPMC4226108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.