Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25331774›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2014

Optimization and comparison of multiple MALDI matrix application methods for small molecule mass spectrometric imaging.

Erin Gemperline, Stephanie Rawson, Lingjun Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Analytical chemistry · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin GemperlineDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Stephanie Rawson
Lingjun Li
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

TR&D 3: TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR NMR STUDIES OF SMALL MOLECULES (METABOLOMICS, NATURAL PRODUCTS, METABOLITE-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS) pp.537-585 P41GM103399 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BUTCHER, SAMUEL E · 2012 to 2019
$9.4M
The BMRB as an evolving resource for biomolecular structure-function researchR01GM109046 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2014 to 2022
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103399NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The matrix application technique is critical to the success of a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) experiment. This work presents a systematic study aiming to evaluate three different matrix application techniques for MALDI mass spectrometric imaging (MSI) of endogenous metabolites from legume plant, Medicago truncatula, root nodules. Airbrush, automatic sprayer, and sublimation matrix application methods were optimized individually for detection of metabolites in the positive ionization mode exploiting the two most widely used MALDI matrices, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) and α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA). Analytical reproducibility and analyte diffusion were examined and compared side-by-side for each method. When using DHB, the optimized method developed for the automatic matrix sprayer system resulted in approximately double the number of metabolites detected when compared to sublimation and airbrush. The automatic sprayer method also showed more reproducible results and less analyte diffusion than the airbrush method. Sublimation matrix deposition yielded high spatial resolution and reproducibility but fewer analytes in the higher m/z range (500-1000 m/z). When the samples were placed in a humidity chamber after sublimation, there was enhanced detection of higher mass metabolites but increased analyte diffusion in the lower mass range. When using CHCA, the optimized automatic sprayer method and humidified sublimation method resulted in double the number of metabolites detected compared to standard airbrush method.

Indexed as

BenzoatesCoumaric AcidsReproducibility of ResultsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionizationalpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamateBenzoatesCoumaric Acids

Identifiers

PMID25331774
PMCPMC4204912
OpenAlexW2328610864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.