SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 341 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to Improve Outcomes After Pregnancy Loss: A Systematic Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of therapeutic interventions for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Australasian recurrent pregnancy loss clinical management guideline 2024, part II.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2024Guideline
- Decidual macrophages in recurrent spontaneous abortion.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Vitamin supplementation for preventing miscarriage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Phenotype- and phase-directed immune interpretation in recurrent implantation failure and pregnancy loss: an integrative framework.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Chromosomal abnormalities in primary and secondary recurrent miscarriages: significance for PGT-A.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Exploring the Immunological Aspects and Treatments of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Recurrent Implantation Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Burden, causes, and treatment approaches of recurrent pregnancy loss: a scoping review.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
- Research overview and hotspots in the field of recurrent miscarriage: A literature-mining study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective analysis of patients with abnormal cellular immunity.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Maternal-Fetal Compatibility in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Effect of a 20% intravenous fat emulsion therapy on pregnancy outcomes in women with RPL or RIF undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2023Review
- Omega-3 fatty acid supplements and recurrent miscarriage: A perspective on potential mechanisms and clinical evidence.Food science & nutrition · 2023Review
- The Influence of Maternal KIR Haplotype on the Reproductive Outcomes after Single Embryo Transfer in IVF Cycles in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Implantation Failure-A Single Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBecause immunological aberrations might be the cause of miscarriage in some women, several immunotherapies have been used to treat women with otherwise unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of any immunotherapy, including paternal leukocyte immunization and intravenous immunoglobulin on the live birth rate in women with previous unexplained recurrent miscarriages. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (11 February 2014) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials of immunotherapies used to treat women with three or more prior miscarriages and no more than one live birth after, in whom all recognized non-immunologic causes of recurrent miscarriage had been ruled out and no simultaneous treatment was given. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The review author and the two co-authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality for all studies considered for this review. MAIN
resultsTwenty trials of high quality were included. The various forms of immunotherapy did not show significant differences between treatment and control groups in terms of subsequent live births: paternal cell immunization (12 trials, 641 women), Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.70; third-party donor cell immunization (three trials, 156 women), Peto OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.82; trophoblast membrane infusion (one trial, 37 women), Peto OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.45; or intravenous immunoglobulin, (eight trials, 303 women), Peto OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.58. AUTHORS'
conclusionsPaternal cell immunization, third-party donor leukocytes, trophoblast membranes, and intravenous immunoglobulin provide no significant beneficial effect over placebo in improving the live birth rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.