Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25331248›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2015

Examination of rhythmicity of extracellularly recorded neurons in the entorhinal cortex.

Jason R Climer, Ronald DiTullio, Ehren L Newman, Michael E Hasselmo, Uri T Eden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sharp Tuning of Head Direction and Angular Head Velocity Cells in the Somatosensory Cortex.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Altered neural odometry in the vertical dimension.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Head-Directional Tuning and Theta Modulation of Anatomically Identified Neurons in the Presubiculum.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason R ClimerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Massachusetts.
Ronald DiTullio
Ehren L Newman
Michael E Hasselmo
Uri T Eden
Boston University · USCenter for Pain and the Brain · US

Funding

NEUROMODULATION AND CORTICAL MEMORY FUNCTIONR01MH060013 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2019
$6.8M
Mechanisms of Entorhinal Cortex FunctionR01MH061492 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2017
$5.0M
Optogenetic Manipulation of Hippocampal Rhythms, Encoding, and RetrievalF31MH102022 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CLIMER, JASON ROBERT · 2014 to 2015
$62k
NIMH NIH HHS 1F31MH102022-01A1NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH102022NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060013NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061492NIMH NIH HHS R01MH60013NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH61492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of studies have examined the theta-rhythmic modulation of neuronal firing in the hippocampal circuit. For extracellular recordings, this is often done by examining spectral properties of the spike-time autocorrelogram, most significantly, for validating the presence or absence of theta modulation across species. These techniques can show significant rhythmicity for high firing rate, highly rhythmic neurons; however, they are substantially biased by several factors including the peak firing rate of the neuron, the amount of time spent in the neuron's receptive field, and other temporal properties of the rhythmicity such as cycle-skipping. These limitations make it difficult to examine rhythmic modulation in neurons with low firing rates or when an animal has short dwell times within the firing field and difficult to compare rhythmicity under disparate experimental conditions when these factors frequently differ. Here, we describe in detail the challenges that researchers face when using these techniques and apply our findings to recent recordings from bat entorhinal grid cells, suggesting that they may have lacked enough data to examine theta rhythmicity robustly. We describe a more sensitive and statistically rigorous method using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of a parametric model of the lags within the autocorrelation window, which helps to alleviate some of the problems of traditional methods and was also unable to detect rhythmicity in bat grid cells. Using large batteries of simulated data, we explored the boundaries for which the MLE technique and the theta index can detect rhythmicity. The MLE technique is less sensitive to many features of the autocorrelogram and provides a framework for statistical testing to detect rhythmicity as well as changes in rhythmicity in individual sessions providing a substantial improvement over previous methods.

Indexed as

PeriodicityAction PotentialsAnimalsConfidence IntervalsEntorhinal CortexLikelihood FunctionsNeuronsRatsTheta Rhythmbatgrid cellmaximum likelihood estimationrattheta

Identifiers

PMID25331248
PMCPMC4457388
OpenAlexW1920404411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.