ArticleDer Nervenarzt2014
[Clinically validated molecular biomarkers of neurodegenerative dementia].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting, preventing, and identifying delirium after cardiac surgery.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As cerebrospinal fluid-based neurochemical dementia diagnostics (CSF-NDD) has now been validated at the S3 evidence level, the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) and the German Society for Neurology (DGN) recommend CSF-NDD in the recent joint dementia guidelines for improved early and differential diagnostics of multigenic (sporadic) Alzheimer's dementia (AD). The CSF-NDD also provides a predictive diagnosis of incipient AD for high-risk patients when they are still in the prodromal stage of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) but as no (secondary) preventive therapy of AD is currently available, the use of CSF-NDD for the predictive molecular diagnosis of AD is not recommended in the neuropsychiatry guidelines (http://www.DGPPN.de). However, molecular diagnostics of preclinical AD by CSF-NDD and/or [18F]-amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) has meanwhile gained high clinical relevance for therapeutic clinical research, as this novel clinical model allows systematic screening for promising (secondary) preventive therapy options. Moreover, it has now become apparent that blood-based neurochemical diagnostics of preclinical and early AD will be possible by means of various formats of multiplex assays. However, so far promising blood assays have not been consistently validated by independent research groups and in contrast to CSF-NDD a blood-based diagnosis of AD is not yet available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25331214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.