Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25330838›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2014

Transcranial bright light treatment via the ear canals in seasonal affective disorder: a randomized, double-blind dose-response study.

Heidi Jurvelin, Timo Takala, Juuso Nissilä, Markku Timonen, Melanie Rüger, Jari Jokelainen, Pirkko Räsänen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01293409 (Transcranial Brain-Targeted Bright Light Treatment Via Ear Canals in Seasonal Affective Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01293409 nacompletednot on this map

Transcranial Brain-Targeted Bright Light Treatment Via Ear Canals in Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) - a Randomized Placebo Controlled Dose Finding Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OuluRan2010 to 2011Enrolled90ConditionsSeasonal Affective DisorderArmsTranscranial Brain-Targeted Bright Light Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heidi JurvelinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oulu, 90014, Finland. Heidi.Jurvelin@student.oulu.fi.
Timo Takala
Juuso Nissilä
Markku Timonen
Melanie Rüger
Jari Jokelainen
Pirkko Räsänen
University of Oulu · FIOulu Deaconess Institute · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBright light treatment is effective for seasonal affective disorder (SAD), although the mechanisms of action are still unknown. We investigated whether transcranial bright light via the ear canals has an antidepressant effect in the treatment of SAD.

methodsDuring the four-week study period, 89 patients (67 females; 22 males, aged 22-65, mean ± SD age: 43.2 ± 10.9 years) suffering from SAD were randomized to receive a 12-min daily dose of photic energy of one of three intensities (1 lumen/0.72 mW/cm(2); 4 lumens/2.881 mW/cm(2); 9 lumens/6.482 mW/cm(2)) via the ear canals. The light was produced using light-emitting diodes. The severity of depressive symptoms was assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Seasonal Affective Disorder (SIGH-SAD), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Cognitive performance was measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT). The within-group and between-group changes in these variables throughout the study were analysed with a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas gender differences at baseline within the light groups were analysed using Student's t-tests.

resultsPatients in all three groups showed significant decreases in their BDI, HAMA, and SIGH-SAD scores. Response rates, i.e., an at least 50% decrease of symptoms as measured by the BDI, were 74%-79% in the three treatment groups. Corresponding variations for the SIGH-SAD and the HAMA were 35-45% and 47-62%, respectively. No intensity-based dose-response relationships in the improvement of anxiety and depressive symptoms or cognitive performance between treatment groups were observed. Approximately one in four patients experienced mild adverse effects, of which the most common were headache, insomnia, and nausea.

conclusionsThese results suggests that transcranial bright light treatment may have antidepressant and anxiolytic effect in SAD patients, as both self- and psychiatrist-rated depressive and anxiety symptoms decreased in all treatment groups. These improvements are comparable to findings of earlier bright light studies that used conventional devices. The lack of dose response may be due to a saturation effect above a certain light intensity threshold. Further studies on the effects of transcranial bright light with an adequate placebo condition are needed.

trial registrationNCT01293409, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Ear CanalAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhototherapyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSeasonal Affective DisorderTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25330838
PMCPMC4207317
OpenAlexW2125251875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.