Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25330789›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2014

Contemporary concepts in the aetiopathogenesis of detrusor underactivity.

Nadir I Osman, Christopher R Chapple

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. When you say "Prostate", don't forget to say "Bladder"!Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bladder Replacement Therapy.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadir I OsmanDepartment of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2JF, UK.
Christopher R ChappleDepartment of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2JF, UK.
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detrusor underactivity (DUA) is a poorly understood, yet common, bladder dysfunction, referred to as underactive bladder, which is observed in both men and women undergoing urodynamic studies. Despite its prevalence, no effective therapeutic approaches exist for DUA. Exactly how the contractile function of the detrusor muscle changes with ageing is unclear. Data from physiological studies in animal and human bladders are contradictory, as are the results of the limited number of clinical studies assessing changes in urodynamic parameters with ageing. The prevalence of DUA in different patient groups suggests that multiple aetiologies are involved in DUA pathogenesis. Traditional concepts focused on either efferent innervation or myogenic dysfunction. By contrast, contemporary views emphasize the importance of the neural control mechanisms, particularly the afferent system, which can fail to potentiate detrusor contraction, leading to premature termination of the voiding reflex. In conclusion, the contemporary understanding of the aetiology and pathophysiology of DUA is limited. Further elucidation of the underlying mechanisms is needed to enable the development of new and effective treatment approaches.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAgingAnimalsDiabetes ComplicationsHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle, SmoothNervous System DiseasesPeripheral Nerve InjuriesUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrinary Bladder Neck ObstructionUrodynamics

Identifiers

PMID25330789
OpenAlexW2094529205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.