Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25330714›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2014

Validation in Swedish of Sydney swallow questionnaire.

Beatriz Arenaz Búa, Margareta Bülow

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04465903 (Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04465903 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ-T)

TypeobservationalSponsorProf. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital OrganizationRan2020 to 2020Enrolled170ConditionsDysphagia, Oropharyngeal, Swallowing Disorder, ValidationArmsTurkish Version of Sydney Swallow Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Systematic retrospective study of oral cancer-related quality of life scale].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of a Dutch Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire: Assessing Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Severity in Dutch-Speaking Populations.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beatriz Arenaz BúaDivision of Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Jan Waldenströmsgata 18, SE- 205 02 Malmö, Sweden. barenazb@yahoo.com.
Margareta Bülow

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to translate and adapt the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire to Swedish conditions and to evaluate the validity and test-retest reliability of the Swedish translation in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and in healthy controls.

methodsThe validation included 20 patients with swallowing problems and 20 controls matched in age and sex. Patients were assigned a Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale. Content, construct, discriminant and predictive validity and test-retest reliability were evaluated.

resultsThe Swedish version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire was close to the original version, easy to fill in, and well accepted. The form fulfilled the criteria for content, construct, discriminant and predictive validity and test-retest reliability.

conclusionsThe Swedish translation of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire proved to be a valid instrument to assess dysphagia symptoms and could be used in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAgedConfidence IntervalsDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersDiscriminant AnalysisFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricSweden

Identifiers

PMID25330714
PMCPMC4216845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.