Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25330390›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Neural substrates of cognitive subtypes in Parkinson's disease: a 3-year longitudinal study.

Yumiko Shoji, Yoshiyuki Nishio, Toru Baba, Makoto Uchiyama, Kayoko Yokoi, Toshiyuki Ishioka, Yoshiyuki Hosokai, Kazumi Hirayama, Hiroshi Fukuda, Masashi Aoki and 3 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Can neuroimaging predict dementia in Parkinson's disease?Brain : a journal of neurology · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. DnaJ/Hsp40 Family and Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  9. Visual dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yumiko ShojiDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshiyuki NishioDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Toru BabaDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Makoto UchiyamaDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Kayoko YokoiDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Toshiyuki IshiokaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
Yoshiyuki HosokaiDepartment of Diagnostic Image Analysis, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kazumi HirayamaDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Occupational Therapy, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Science, Yamagata, Japan.
Hiroshi FukudaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Masashi AokiDepartment of Neurology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Takafumi HasegawaDepartment of Neurology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Atsushi TakedaDepartment of Neurology, Sendai Nishitaga Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Etsuro MoriDepartment of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neuropsychological features and neuropathological progression patterns associated with rapidly evolving cognitive decline or dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD) remain to be elucidated.

methodsFifty-three PD patients without dementia were recruited to participate in a 3-year longitudinal cohort study. The patients were grouped according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Group-wise comparisons were made with regard to demographic characteristics, motor symptoms, neuropsychological performances and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

resultsPatients who had memory-plus cognitive impairment (patients whose CDR was 0 at baseline and 0.5 in memory and other domains at follow-up, and those whose baseline CDR was 0.5 in memory and other domains) exhibited higher age at onset, visuoperceptual impairment, non-tremor-dominant motor disturbance, rapid symptomatic progression and posterior neocortical hypometabolism. In patients who were cognitively unimpaired and those who had memory-dominant cognitive impairment (patients whose CDR was 0 at baseline and 0.5 only in memory domain at follow-up, and those whose baseline CDR was 0.5 only in memory domain), the posterior neocortex was relatively unaffected until a later stage of the disease.

conclusionsThese results suggest that visuoperceptual impairment and the early involvement of the posterior neocortex may be risk factors for rapid symptomatic progression and dementia in PD.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersDementiaNeocortexParkinson DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyRadiography

Identifiers

PMID25330390
PMCPMC4203806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.