Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25330378›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2014

Trends in elective labor induction for six United States health plans, 2001-2007.

Sascha Dublin, Karin E Johnson, Rod L Walker, Lyndsay A Avalos, Susan E Andrade, Sarah J Beaton, Robert L Davis, Lisa J Herrinton, Pamala A Pawloski, Marsha A Raebel and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Sascha Dublin1 Group Health Research Institute , Seattle, Washingon.
Karin E Johnson
Rod L Walker
Lyndsay A Avalos
Susan E Andrade
Sarah J Beaton
Robert L Davis
Lisa J Herrinton
Pamala A Pawloski
Marsha A Raebel
David H Smith
Sengwee Toh
Aaron B Caughey
Center for Infectious Disease Research · USKaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USHarvard University · USHealthPartners · USLovelace Clinic Foundation Research · USMeyer (China) · CNOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

UCSF/Kaiser-DOR Program for Developing Independent Women's Health ResearchersK12HD052163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER, NANCY E, BRINDIS, CLAIRE D. · 2005 to 2023
$9.3M
Pharmacepidemiology in the elderly: medications pneumonia risk and confoundingK23AG028954 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI DUBLIN, SASCHA · 2007 to 2011
$864k
AHRQ HHS U18HS0169555NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028954NIA NIH HHS K23AG028954NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052163NICHD NIH HHS K12HD052163PHS HHS HHSF223200510008CPHS HHS HHSF223200510009CPHS HHS HHSF223200510012C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo describe trends in labor induction, including elective induction, from 2001 to 2007 for six U.S. health plans and to examine the validity of induction measures derived from birth certificate and health plan data.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 339,123 deliveries at 35 weeks' gestation or greater. Linked health plan and birth certificate data provided information about induction, maternal medical conditions, and pregnancy complications. Induction was defined from diagnosis and procedure codes and birth certificate data and considered elective if no accepted indication was coded. We calculated induction prevalence across health plans and years. At four health plans, we reviewed medical records to validate induction measures.

resultsBased on electronic data, induction prevalence rose from 28% in 2001 to 32% in 2005, then declined to 29% in 2007. The trend was driven by changes in the prevalence of apparent elective induction, which rose from 11% in 2001 to 14% in 2005 and then declined to 11% in 2007. The trend was similar for subgroups by parity and gestational age. Elective induction prevalence varied considerably across plans. On review of 86 records, 36% of apparent elective inductions identified from electronic data were confirmed as valid.

conclusionsElective induction appeared to peak in 2005 and then decline. The decrease may reflect quality improvement initiatives or changes in policies, patient or provider attitudes, or coding practices. The low validation rate for measures of elective induction defined from electronic data has important implications for existing quality measures and for research studies examining induction's outcomes.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInsurance CoverageLabor, InducedMedical RecordsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrevalenceQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID25330378
PMCPMC4235981
OpenAlexW2046939192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.