Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25330230›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

In amnio MRI of mouse embryos.

Thomas A Roberts, Francesca C Norris, Helen Carnaghan, Dawn Savery, Jack A Wells, Bernard Siow, Peter J Scambler, Agostino Pierro, Paolo De Coppi, Simon Eaton and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas A RobertsUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom; UCL Centre for Mathematics and Physics in the Life Sciences and Experimental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Francesca C NorrisUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom; UCL Centre for Mathematics and Physics in the Life Sciences and Experimental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Helen CarnaghanUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dawn SaveryUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jack A WellsUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bernard SiowUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter J ScamblerUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Agostino PierroUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paolo De CoppiUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Simon EatonUCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark F LythgoeUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/10/13/28570Medical Research Council MR/J013110/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K500276/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse embryo imaging is conventionally carried out on ex vivo embryos excised from the amniotic sac, omitting vital structures and abnormalities external to the body. Here, we present an in amnio MR imaging methodology in which the mouse embryo is retained in the amniotic sac and demonstrate how important embryonic structures can be visualised in 3D with high spatial resolution (100 µm/px). To illustrate the utility of in amnio imaging, we subsequently apply the technique to examine abnormal mouse embryos with abdominal wall defects. Mouse embryos at E17.5 were imaged and compared, including three normal phenotype embryos, an abnormal embryo with a clear exomphalos defect, and one with a suspected gastroschisis phenotype. Embryos were excised from the mother ensuring the amnion remained intact and stereo microscopy was performed. Embryos were next embedded in agarose for 3D, high resolution MRI on a 9.4T scanner. Identification of the abnormal embryo phenotypes was not possible using stereo microscopy or conventional ex vivo MRI. Using in amnio MRI, we determined that the abnormal embryos had an exomphalos phenotype with varying severities. In amnio MRI is ideally suited to investigate the complex relationship between embryo and amnion, together with screening for other abnormalities located outside of the mouse embryo, providing a valuable complement to histology and existing imaging methods available to the phenotyping community.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAmnionAmniotic FluidAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianFemaleHumansMicePlacentaPregnancyRadiographyUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID25330230
PMCPMC4198080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.