Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329931›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genetic inactivation of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) eggs using UV-irradiation: observations and perspectives.

Julie Colléter, David J Penman, Stéphane Lallement, Christian Fauvel, Tanja Hanebrekke, Renate D Osvik, Hans C Eilertsen, Helena D'Cotta, Béatrice Chatain, Stefano Peruzzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Computation of the inverse additive relationship matrix for autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julie ColléterCirad, Persyst, UMR Intrepid, Campus International de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France; Ifremer, Laboratoire de Recherche Piscicole en Méditerranée, Station Expérimentale d'Aquaculture, Palavas Les Flots, France.
David J PenmanUniversity of Stirling, Institute of Aquaculture, Stirling, Scotland.
Stéphane LallementIfremer, Laboratoire de Recherche Piscicole en Méditerranée, Station Expérimentale d'Aquaculture, Palavas Les Flots, France.
Christian FauvelIfremer, Laboratoire de Recherche Piscicole en Méditerranée, Station Expérimentale d'Aquaculture, Palavas Les Flots, France.
Tanja HanebrekkeDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Renate D OsvikDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Hans C EilertsenDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Helena D'CottaCirad, Persyst, UMR Intrepid, Campus International de Baillarguet, Montpellier, France.
Béatrice ChatainIfremer, Laboratoire de Recherche Piscicole en Méditerranée, Station Expérimentale d'Aquaculture, Palavas Les Flots, France.
Stefano PeruzziDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Ifremer · FRUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Androgenesis is a form of uniparental reproduction leading to progenies inheriting only the paternal set of chromosomes. It has been achieved with variable success in a number of freshwater species and can be attained by artificial fertilization of genetically inactivated eggs following exposure to gamma (γ), X-ray or UV irradiation (haploid androgenesis) and by restoration of diploidy by suppression of mitosis using a pressure or thermal shock. The conditions for the genetic inactivation of the maternal genome in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) were explored using different combinations of UV irradiation levels and durations. UV treatments significantly affected embryo survival and generated a wide range of developmental abnormalities. Despite the wide range of UV doses tested (from 7.2 to 720 mJ x cm(-2)), only one dose (60 mJ x cm(-2) x min(-1) with 1 min irradiation) resulted in a small percentage (14%) of haploid larvae at hatching in the initial trials as verified by flow cytometry. Microsatellite marker analyses of three further batches of larvae produced by using this UV treatment showed a majority of larvae with variable levels of paternal and maternal contributions and only one larva displaying pure paternal inheritance. The results are discussed also in the context of an assessment of the UV-absorbance characteristics of egg extracts in this species that revealed the presence of gadusol, a compound structurally related to mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) with known UV-screening properties.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAnimalsBassDiploidyEmbryo, NonmammalianGene SilencingLarvaMicrosatellite RepeatsOvumPloidiesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25329931
PMCPMC4203730
OpenAlexW2100686674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.