ArticlePloS one2014
Gene expression differences among three Neurospora species reveal genes required for sexual reproduction in Neurospora crassa.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Rates of Evolution of Developmental Changes in Gene Expression in Sordariomycetes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- STRIPAK, a fundamental signaling hub of eukaryotic development.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024Review
- Origins of lineage-specific elements via gene duplication, relocation, and regional rearrangement in Neurospora crassa.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- A winged-helix DNA-binding protein is essential for self-fertility during sexual development of the homothallic fungusmSphere · 2024Article
- What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?Studies in mycology · 2024Article
- CSE-8, a filamentous fungus-specific Shr3-like chaperone, facilitates endoplasmic reticulum exit of chitin synthase CHS-3 (class I) inFrontiers in fungal biology · 2024Article
- Lineage-specific genes are clustered with HET-domain genes and respond to environmental and genetic manipulations regulating reproduction in Neurospora.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Needles in fungal haystacks: Discovery of a putative a-factor pheromone and a unique mating strategy in the Leotiomycetes.PloS one · 2023Article
- The Sordariomycetes: an expanding resource with Big Data for mining in evolutionary genomics and transcriptomics.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Cross-species transcriptomics identifies core regulatory changes differentiating the asymptomatic asexual and virulent sexual life cycles of grass-symbiotic Epichloë fungi.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Article
- A putative transcription factor LFC1 negatively regulates development and yield of winter mushroom.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Pathological, Morphological, Cytogenomic, Biochemical and Molecular Data Support the Distinction betweenPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A WD40 Protein Encoding GeneFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Comparative Genomics and Transcriptomics To Analyze Fruiting Body Development in Filamentous Ascomycetes.Genetics · 2019Article
- The Zn(II)2Cys6-Type Transcription Factor ADA-6 Regulates Conidiation, Sexual Development, and Oxidative Stress Response inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- The Genetics and Biochemistry of Cell Wall Structure and Synthesis inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Many fungi form complex three-dimensional fruiting bodies, within which the meiotic machinery for sexual spore production has been considered to be largely conserved over evolutionary time. Indeed, much of what we know about meiosis in plant and animal taxa has been deeply informed by studies of meiosis in Saccharomyces and Neurospora. Nevertheless, the genetic basis of fruiting body development and its regulation in relation to meiosis in fungi is barely known, even within the best studied multicellular fungal model Neurospora crassa. We characterized morphological development and genome-wide transcriptomics in the closely related species Neurospora crassa, Neurospora tetrasperma, and Neurospora discreta, across eight stages of sexual development. Despite diverse life histories within the genus, all three species produce vase-shaped perithecia. Transcriptome sequencing provided gene expression levels of orthologous genes among all three species. Expression of key meiosis genes and sporulation genes corresponded to known phenotypic and developmental differences among these Neurospora species during sexual development. We assembled a list of genes putatively relevant to the recent evolution of fruiting body development by sorting genes whose relative expression across developmental stages increased more in N. crassa relative to the other species. Then, in N. crassa, we characterized the phenotypes of fruiting bodies arising from crosses of homozygous knockout strains of the top genes. Eight N. crassa genes were found to be critical for the successful formation of perithecia. The absence of these genes in these crosses resulted in either no perithecium formation or in arrested development at an early stage. Our results provide insight into the genetic basis of Neurospora sexual reproduction, which is also of great importance with regard to other multicellular ascomycetes, including perithecium-forming pathogens, such as Claviceps purpurea, Ophiostoma ulmi, and Glomerella graminicola.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.