Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329581›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Writing in and reading ICU diaries: qualitative study of families' experience in the ICU.

Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Antoine Périer, Philippe Mouricou, Charles Grégoire, Cédric Bruel, Sandie Brochon, François Philippart, Adeline Max, Benoit Misset

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Uptake and impact of journaling program on wellbeing of NICU parents.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maité Garrouste-OrgeasMedical-Surgical ICU, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France; IAME, UMR 1137, Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Antoine PérierMaison des Adolescents, University Hospital Cochin, Paris, France; INSERM U-669, University Paris Sud and University Paris Descartes, UMR-S0669, Paris, France.
Philippe MouricouManagement department, ESSCA School of Management PRES UNAM, Boulogne- Billancourt, France.
Charles GrégoireMedical-Surgical ICU, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France.
Cédric BruelMedical-Surgical ICU, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France.
Sandie BrochonMedical-Surgical ICU, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France.
François PhilippartMedical-Surgical ICU, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France.
Adeline MaxMedical-Surgical ICU, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France.
Benoit MissetMedical-Surgical ICU, Saint Joseph Hospital Network, Paris, France; University Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKeeping an ICU patient diary has been reported to benefit the patient's recovery. Here, we investigated the families' experience with reading and writing in patient ICU diaries kept by both the family and the staff.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study involving 32 semi-structured in-depth interviews of relatives of 26 patients (34% of all family members who visited patients) who met our ICU-diary criterion, i.e., ventilation for longer than 48 hours. Grounded theory was used to conceptualise the interview data via a three-step coding process (open coding, axial coding, and selective coding).

resultsCommunicative, emotional, and humanising experiences emerged from our data. First, family members used the diaries to access, understand, and assimilate the medical information written in the diaries by staff members, and then to share this information with other family members. Second, the diaries enabled family members to maintain a connection with the patient by documenting their presence and expressing their love and affection. Additionally, families confided in the diaries to maintain hope. Finally, family members felt the diaries humanized the medical staff and patient.

conclusionsOur findings indicate positive effects of diaries on family members. The diaries served as a powerful tool to deliver holistic patient- and family-centered care despite the potentially dehumanising ICU environment. The diaries made the family members aware of their valuable role in caring for the patient and enhanced their access to and comprehension of medical information. Diaries may play a major role in improving the well-being of ICU-patient families.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsReadingWritingAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFamilyFemaleHopeHumansLoveMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25329581
PMCPMC4199718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.