Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329559›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A model for cell wall dissolution in mating yeast cells: polarized secretion and restricted diffusion of cell wall remodeling enzymes induces local dissolution.

Lori B Huberman, Andrew W Murray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Conserved physical mechanisms of cell and tissue elongation.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  4. Sticking to the Subject: Multifunctionality in Microbial Adhesins.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell biology of yeast zygotes, from genesis to budding.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lori B HubermanMolecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America; Faculty of Arts and Sciences Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Andrew W MurrayMolecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America; Faculty of Arts and Sciences Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Center for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · US

Funding

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL MODULESP50GM068763 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BENENSON, YAAKOV · 2003 to 2012
$28.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM068763NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM068763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, occurs when two haploid cells of opposite mating types signal using reciprocal pheromones and receptors, grow towards each other, and fuse to form a single diploid cell. To fuse, both cells dissolve their cell walls at the point of contact. This event must be carefully controlled because the osmotic pressure differential between the cytoplasm and extracellular environment causes cells with unprotected plasma membranes to lyse. If the cell wall-degrading enzymes diffuse through the cell wall, their concentration would rise when two cells touched each other, such as when two pheromone-stimulated cells adhere to each other via mating agglutinins. At the surfaces that touch, the enzymes must diffuse laterally through the wall before they can escape into the medium, increasing the time the enzymes spend in the cell wall, and thus raising their concentration at the point of attachment and restricting cell wall dissolution to points where cells touch each other. We tested this hypothesis by studying pheromone treated cells confined between two solid, impermeable surfaces. This confinement increases the frequency of pheromone-induced cell death, and this effect is diminished by reducing the osmotic pressure difference across the cell wall or by deleting putative cell wall glucanases and other genes necessary for efficient cell wall fusion. Our results support the model that pheromone-induced cell death is the result of a contact-driven increase in the local concentration of cell wall remodeling enzymes and suggest that this process plays an important role in regulating cell wall dissolution and fusion in mating cells.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell AdhesionCell WallDiffusionOsmosisPheromonesReproductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSurface PropertiesPheromonesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25329559
PMCPMC4199604
OpenAlexW2118489097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.