Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329501›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Umbilical cord Wharton's jelly repeated culture system: a new device and method for obtaining abundant mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue engineering.

Zhengqi Chang, Tianyong Hou, Junchao Xing, Xuehui Wu, Huiyong Jin, Zhiqiang Li, Moyuan Deng, Zhao Xie, Jianzhong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of Different Culture Conditions for Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Umbilical Cord Wharton’s Jelly for Stem Cell TherapyTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhengqi ChangNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China; Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Jinan Military Commanding Region, Jinan, China.
Tianyong HouNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.
Junchao XingNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.
Xuehui WuNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.
Huiyong JinNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.
Zhiqiang LiNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.
Moyuan DengNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.
Zhao XieNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.
Jianzhong XuNational & Regional United Engineering Lab of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Center of Tissue Engineering Research and Application, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China; Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Chongqing City, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, various types of cells for seeding regenerative scaffolds have been used for bone tissue engineering. Among seed cells, the mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly (hUCMSCs) represent a promising candidate and hold potential for bone tissue engineering due to the the lack of ethical controversies, accessibility, sourced by non-invasive procedures for donors, a reduced risk of contamination, osteogenic differentiation capacities, and higher immunomodulatory capacity. However, the current culture methods are somewhat complicated and inefficient and often fail to make the best use of the umbilical cord (UC) tissues. Moreover, these culture processes cannot be performed on a large scale and under strict quality control. As a result, only a small quantity of cells can be harvested using the current culture methods. To solve these problems, we designed and evaluated an UC Wharton's jelly repeated culture device. Using this device, hUCMSCs were obtained from the repeated cultures and their quantities and biological characteristics were compared. We found that using our culture device, which retained all tissue blocks on the bottom of the dish, the total number of obtained cells increased 15-20 times, and the time required for the primary passage was reduced. Moreover, cells harvested from the repeated cultures exhibited no significant difference in their immunophenotype, potential for multilineage differentiation, or proliferative, osteoinductive capacities, and final osteogenesis. The application of the repeated culture frame (RCF) not only made full use of the Wharton's jelly but also simplified and specified the culture process, and thus, the culture efficiency was significantly improved. In summary, abundant hUCMSCs of dependable quality can be acquired using the RCF.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell ProliferationOsteogenesisTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID25329501
PMCPMC4203828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.