Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329478›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Computational insights into the inhibitory mechanism of human AKT1 by an orally active inhibitor, MK-2206.

Mohd Rehan, Mohd A Beg, Shadma Parveen, Ghazi A Damanhouri, Galila F Zaher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In-silico inquest reveal the efficacy ofIn silico pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohd RehanKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohd A BegKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Shadma ParveenBareilly College, M. J. P. Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ghazi A DamanhouriKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Galila F ZaherDepartment of Haematology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SAM.J.P. Rohilkhand University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AKT signaling pathway has been identified as an important target for cancer therapy. Among small-molecule inhibitors of AKT that have shown tremendous potential in inhibiting cancer, MK-2206 is a highly potent, selective and orally active allosteric inhibitor. Promising preclinical anticancer results have led to entry of MK-2206 into Phase I/II clinical trials. Despite such importance, the exact binding mechanism and the molecular interactions of MK-2206 with human AKT are not available. The current study investigated the exact binding mode and the molecular interactions of MK-2206 with human AKT isoforms using molecular docking and (un)binding simulation analyses. The study also involved the docking analyses of the structural analogs of MK-2206 to AKT1 and proposed one as better inhibitor. The Dock was used for docking simulations of MK-2206 into the allosteric site of AKT isoforms. The Ligplot+ was used for analyses of polar and hydrophobic interactions between AKT isoforms and the ligands. The MoMa-LigPath web server was used to simulate the ligand (un)binding from the binding site to the surface of the protein. In the docking and (un)binding simulation analyses of MK-2206 with human AKT1, the Trp-80 was the key residue and showed highest decrease in the solvent accessibility, highest number of hydrophobic interactions, and the most consistent involvement in all (un)binding simulation phases. The number of molecular interactions identified and calculated binding energies and dissociation constants from the co-complex structures of these isoforms, clearly explained the varying affinity of MK-2206 towards these isoforms. The (un)binding simulation analyses identified various additional residues which despite being away from the binding site, play important role in initial binding of the ligand. Thus, the docking and (un)binding simulation analyses of MK-2206 with AKT isoforms and its structure analogs will provide a suitable model for studying drug-protein interaction and will help in designing better drugs.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationAmino Acid SequenceAntineoplastic AgentsBinding SitesHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAKT1 protein, humanAntineoplastic AgentsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingMK 2206Protein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID25329478
PMCPMC4201482
OpenAlexW1991557988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.