Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329397›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Characterization of egg laying hen and broiler fecal microbiota in poultry farms in Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia.

Petra Videnska, Md Masudur Rahman, Marcela Faldynova, Vladimir Babak, Marta Elsheimer Matulova, Estella Prukner-Radovcic, Ivan Krizek, Sonja Smole-Mozina, Jasna Kovac, Ama Szmolka and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Long-Term Grow-Out AffectsFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Petra VidenskaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Md Masudur RahmanVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marcela FaldynovaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vladimir BabakVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marta Elsheimer MatulovaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Estella Prukner-RadovcicFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan KrizekFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sonja Smole-MozinaBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jasna KovacBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ama SzmolkaInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Bela NagyInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Karel SedlarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Darina CejkovaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ivan RychlikVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry meat is the most common protein source of animal origin for humans. However, intensive breeding of animals in confined spaces has led to poultry colonisation by microbiota with a zoonotic potential or encoding antibiotic resistances. In this study we were therefore interested in the prevalence of selected antibiotic resistance genes and microbiota composition in feces of egg laying hens and broilers originating from 4 different Central European countries determined by real-time PCR and 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing, respectively. strA gene was present in 1 out of 10,000 bacteria. The prevalence of sul1, sul2 and tet(B) in poultry microbiota was approx. 6 times lower than that of the strA gene. tet(A) and cat were the least prevalent being present in around 3 out of 10,000,000 bacteria forming fecal microbiome. The core chicken fecal microbiota was formed by 26 different families. Rather unexpectedly, representatives of Desulfovibrionaceae and Campylobacteraceae, both capable of hydrogen utilisation in complex microbial communities, belonged among core microbiota families. Understanding the roles of individual population members in the total metabolism of the complex community may allow for interventions which might result in the replacement of Campylobacteraceae with Desulfovibrionaceae and a reduction of Campylobacter colonisation in broilers, carcasses, and consequently poultry meat products.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaOvipositionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensCroatiaCzech RepublicDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesFemaleHungaryRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNASloveniaAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25329397
PMCPMC4199679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.