Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329202›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2014

Sofosbuvir-based treatment regimens for chronic, genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection in U.S. incarcerated populations: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Shan Liu, Daena Watcha, Mark Holodniy, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cost-effectiveness and Budgetary Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Testing, Treatment, and Linkage to Care in US Prisons.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shan Liu
Daena Watcha
Mark Holodniy
Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert

Funding

Cost-effective chronic disease prevention in developing countriesK01AG037593 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDHABER-FIEBERT, JEREMY DAVID · 2011 to 2015
$637k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG037593NIA NIH HHS K01AG037593-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is high among incarcerated persons in the United States. New, short-duration, high-efficacy therapies may expand treatment eligibility in this population.

objectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir for HCV treatment in incarcerated populations.

designMarkov model. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and expert opinion. TARGET POPULATION: Treatment-naive men with chronic, genotype 1 HCV monoinfection. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Societal.

interventionNo treatment, 2-drug therapy (pegylated interferon and ribavirin), or 3-drug therapy with either boceprevir or sofosbuvir. For inmates with short remaining sentences (<1.5 years), only no treatment or sofosbuvir 3-drug therapy was feasible; for those with long sentences (≥1.5 years; mean, 10 years), all strategies were considered. After release, eligible persons could receive sofosbuvir 3-drug therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted costs (in 2013 U.S. dollars), discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: The strategies yielded 13.12, 13.57, 14.43, and 15.18 QALYs, respectively, for persons with long sentences. Sofosbuvir produced the largest absolute reductions in decompensated cirrhosis (16%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (9%), resulting in 2.1 additional QALYs at an added cost exceeding $54,000 compared with no treatment. For persons with short sentences, sofosbuvir cost $25,700 per QALY gained compared with no treatment; for those with long sentences, it dominated other treatments, costing $28,800 per QALY gained compared with no treatment. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: High reinfection rates in prison attenuated cost-effectiveness for persons with long sentences. LIMITATIONS: Data on sofosbuvir's long-term effectiveness and price are limited. The analysis did not consider women, Hispanic persons, or patients co-infected with HIV or hepatitis B virus.

conclusionSofosbuvir-based treatment is cost-effective for incarcerated persons, but affordability is an important consideration. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

PrisonersAdultAntiviral AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsDrug Therapy, CombinationHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansInterferon-alphaMalePolyethylene GlycolsProlineQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRibavirinSofosbuvirAntiviral AgentsInterferon-alphaN-(3-amino-1-(cyclobutylmethyl)-2,3-dioxopropyl)-3-(2-((((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)carbonyl)amino)-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3-azabicyclo(3.1.0)hexan-2-carboxamidePolyethylene GlycolsProlineRibavirinSofosbuvirUridine Monophosphate

Identifiers

PMID25329202
PMCPMC4313741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.