Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329167›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Quantitative analysis of cytokinesis in situ during C. elegans postembryonic development.

Karine G Bourdages, Benjamin Lacroix, Jonas F Dorn, Carlos P Descovich, Amy S Maddox

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cell size and polarization determine cytokinesis furrow ingression dynamics in mouse embryos.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid Degradation ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mitotic Cell Division inGenetics · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Karine G BourdagesInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Benjamin LacroixInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jonas F DornInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Advanced Quantitative Sciences, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Carlos P DescovichDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Amy S MaddoxDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer · CANovartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Super-resolution of the Mechanisms of Cell Shape Change in Cytokinesis - the Zeiss LSM800/AiryscanR01GM102390 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MADDOX, AMY SHAUB · 2012 to 2020
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM102390NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical separation of a cell into two daughter cells during cytokinesis requires cell-intrinsic shape changes driven by a contractile ring. However, in vivo, cells interact with their environment, which includes other cells. How cytokinesis occurs in tissues is not well understood. Here, we studied cytokinesis in an intact animal during tissue biogenesis. We used high-resolution microscopy and quantitative analysis to study the three rounds of division of the C. elegans vulval precursor cells (VPCs). The VPCs are cut in half longitudinally with each division. Contractile ring breadth, but not the speed of ring closure, scales with cell length. Furrowing speed instead scales with division plane dimensions, and scaling is consistent between the VPCs and C. elegans blastomeres. We compared our VPC cytokinesis kinetics data with measurements from the C. elegans zygote and HeLa and Drosophila S2 cells. Both the speed dynamics and asymmetry of ring closure are qualitatively conserved among cell types. Unlike in the C. elegans zygote but similar to other epithelial cells, Anillin is required for proper ring closure speed but not asymmetry in the VPCs. We present evidence that tissue organization impacts the dynamics of cytokinesis by comparing our results on the VPCs with the cells of the somatic gonad. In sum, this work establishes somatic lineages in post-embryonic C. elegans development as cell biological models for the study of cytokinesis in situ.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCytokinesisDrosophila melanogasterFemaleHeLa CellsHumans

Identifiers

PMID25329167
PMCPMC4203819
OpenAlexW2091441160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.