Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25329069›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Canonical correlation analysis for gene-based pleiotropy discovery.

Jose A Seoane, Colin Campbell, Ian N M Day, Juan P Casas, Tom R Gaunt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fair Canonical Correlation Analysis.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fast and Accurate Genome-Wide Association Test of Multiple Quantitative Traits.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jose A SeoaneSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Colin CampbellIntelligent Systems Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Ian N M DaySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Juan P CasasDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Tom R GauntSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/07/131/24254British Heart Foundation PG/13/66/30442Medical Research Council G1000427Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified a wealth of genetic variants involved in complex traits and multifactorial diseases. There is now considerable interest in testing variants for association with multiple phenotypes (pleiotropy) and for testing multiple variants for association with a single phenotype (gene-based association tests). Such approaches can increase statistical power by combining evidence for association over multiple phenotypes or genetic variants respectively. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) measures the correlation between two sets of multidimensional variables, and thus offers the potential to combine these two approaches. To apply CCA, we must restrict the number of attributes relative to the number of samples. Hence we consider modules of genetic variation that can comprise a gene, a pathway or another biologically relevant grouping, and/or a set of phenotypes. In order to do this, we use an attribute selection strategy based on a binary genetic algorithm. Applied to a UK-based prospective cohort study of 4286 women (the British Women's Heart and Health Study), we find improved statistical power in the detection of previously reported genetic associations, and identify a number of novel pleiotropic associations between genetic variants and phenotypes. New discoveries include gene-based association of NSF with triglyceride levels and several genes (ACSM3, ERI2, IL18RAP, IL23RAP and NRG1) with left ventricular hypertrophy phenotypes. In multiple-phenotype analyses we find association of NRG1 with left ventricular hypertrophy phenotypes, fibrinogen and urea and pleiotropic relationships of F7 and F10 with Factor VII, Factor IX and cholesterol levels.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAgedBlood Coagulation FactorsCluster AnalysisDatabases, GeneticFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularMiddle AgedPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideBlood Coagulation Factors

Identifiers

PMID25329069
PMCPMC4199483
OpenAlexW2084716055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.