ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2014
A metagenomic study of the microbial communities in four parallel biogas reactors.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversity, metabolic potential and global distribution of the anaerobic fermentative bacteria Phylum Candidatus Cloacimonadota.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- Metagenomic Exploration Uncovers Several Novel 'Candidatus' Species Involved in Acetate Metabolism in High-Ammonia Thermophilic Biogas Processes.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Two-stage conversion of syngas and pyrolysis aqueous condensate into L-malate.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- Review
- Enhanced methane production with co-feeding spent coffee grounds using spare capacity of existing anaerobic food waste digesters.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genome-resolved correlation mapping links microbial community structure to metabolic interactions driving methane production from wastewater.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Impacts of coniferous bark-derived organic soil amendments on microbial communities in arable soil - a microcosm study.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2023Article
- Metagenomic Analysis of Anaerobic Microbial Communities Degrading Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Sole Carbon Sources.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Phage Genome Diversity in a Biogas-Producing Microbiome Analyzed by Illumina and Nanopore GridION Sequencing.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Woody biomass as a potential feedstock for fermentative gaseous biofuel production.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Review
- The microbiome of the Black Sea water column analyzed by shotgun and genome centric metagenomics.Environmental microbiome · 2021Article
- Diversity and Abundance of Microbial Communities in UASB Reactors during Methane Production from Hydrolyzed Wheat Straw and Lucerne.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Soil-Derived Inocula Enhance Methane Production and Counteract Common Process Failures During Anaerobic Digestion.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Microbial Processes and Microbial Communities in the Water Column of the Polar Meromictic Lake Bol'shie Khruslomeny at the White Sea Coast.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Long-term investigation of microbial community composition and transcription patterns in a biogas plant undergoing ammonia crisis.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Immediate Effects of Ammonia Shock on Transcription and Composition of a Biogas Reactor Microbiome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Effects of HBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of deep sequenced methanogenic communities: identification of microorganisms responsible for methane production.Microbial cell factories · 2018Article
- Effect of Bioaugmentation on Biogas Yields and Kinetics in Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiogas is a renewable energy carrier which is used for heat and power production or, in the form of purified methane, as a vehicle fuel. The formation of methane from organic materials is carried out by a mixed microbial community under anaerobic conditions. However, details about the microbes involved and their function are limited. In this study we compare the metagenomes of four parallel biogas reactors digesting a protein-rich substrate, relate microbiology to biogas performance, and observe differences in these reactors' microbial communities compared to the original inoculum culture.
resultsThe biogas process performance during the startup phase of four parallel continuous stirred tank reactors (designated R1, R2, R3, and R4) co-digesting fish waste and cow manure was studied. The microbial composition of the inoculum (day 0) and the four reactors at day 59 was studied and compared using 454 FLX Titanium pyrosequencing. In the inoculum and the reactor samples, the Bacteria Clostridium and Syntrophomonas were highly abundant, and the dominating methanogen was the hydrogenotrophic Methanoculleus. Syntrophic prokaryotes frequently found in biogas reactors with high concentrations of ammonium and volatile fatty acids were detected in all samples. The species Candidatus Cloacimonas acidaminovorans of the candidate phylum Cloacimonetes (WWE1) increased in all reactors and was the dominating bacterium at day 59. In particular, this bacterium showed a very high abundance in R1, which distinguished this reactor significantly from the other reactors in terms of microbial composition. Methane production and the reactor slurry characteristics were monitored in the digestion period. Generally all four reactors operated stably and showed rather similar characteristics. The average methane production in the reactors varied between 0.278 and 0.296 L gVS(-1), with the lowest production in R1.
conclusionsThis study showed that four parallel reactors co-digesting manure and fish waste silage operated stably during a startup phase. Several important Archaea and Bacteria degrading the protein-rich substrate were identified. In particular, microorganisms involved in syntrophic methane production seemed to be important. The detailed characterization of the microbial communities presented in this work may be useful for the operation of biogas plants degrading substrates with high concentrations of proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.