Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25328451›Full record

ArticleField methods2009

Using participatory mapping to inform a community-randomized trial of HIV counseling and testing.

Suzanne Maman, Tim Lane, Jacob Ntogwisangu, Precious Modiba, Heidi vanRooyen, Andrew Timbe, Surasing Visrutaratna, Katherine Fritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Field methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Enabling methods for community health mapping in developing countries.International journal of health geographics · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suzanne MamanThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC, USA.
Tim LaneCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jacob NtogwisanguMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Science, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Precious ModibaPerinatal HIV Research Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Heidi vanRooyenHealth Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Andrew TimbeUniversity of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Surasing VisrutaratnaChiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Katherine FritzInternational Center for Research on Women, Washington, D.C., USA.

Funding

Community-Based HIV VCT: South AfricaU01MH066701 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COATES, THOMAS J. · 2003 to 2010
$24.3M
Community-Based VCT: ZimbabweU01MH066702 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MORIN, STEPHEN F · 2003 to 2010
$13.4M
Community-Based VCT: TanzaniaU01MH066688 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SWEAT, MICHAEL D · 2003 to 2010
$11.7M
Community-Based VCT: ThailandU01MH066687 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CELENTANO, DAVID D. · 2003 to 2010
$9.8M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066687NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066688NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066701NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participatory mapping and transect walks were used to inform the research and intervention design and to begin building community relations in preparation for Project Accept, a community-randomized trial sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). NIMH Project Accept is being conducted in five sites within four countries including Thailand, Zimbabwe, South Africa and Tanzania. Results from the mapping exercises informed decisions about the research design such as defining community boundaries, and identifying appropriate criteria for matching community pairs for the trial. The mapping also informed intervention related decisions such as where to situate the services. The participatory methods enabled each site to develop an understanding of the communities that could not have been derived from existing data or data collected through standard data collection techniques. Furthermore, the methods lay the foundation for collaborative community research partnerships.

Indexed as

community-randomized trialformative researchmappingparticipatory research methods

Identifiers

PMID25328451
PMCPMC4200541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.