ReviewRisk management and healthcare policy2014
The current state of bioterrorist attack surveillance and preparedness in the US.
Review in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing biological investigations using portable sensors for detection of sensitive samples.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Improved virus concentration methods for wash waters from decontamination of permeable and non-permeable surfaces.Journal of virological methods · 2023Article
- Voltammetric determination ofRSC advances · 2022Article
- The electrochemical detection of bioterrorism agents: a review of the detection, diagnostics, and implementation of sensors in biosafety programs for Class A bioweapons.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2021Review
- Factors Affecting the Decontamination Process in Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- Review
- Factors affecting hospital response in biological disasters: A qualitative study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2020Article
- Development of a novel multiepitope chimeric vaccine against anthrax.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2019Article
- Application of stem cells in tissue engineering for defense medicine.Military Medical Research · 2018Review
- Forensic Approaches to Detect Possible Agents of Bioterror.Microbiology spectrum · 2017Review
- An Assessment of State Board of Pharmacy Legal Documents for Public Health Emergency Preparedness.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- Bioterrorism and the Role of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016Review
- Susceptibility of Select Agents to Predation by Predatory Bacteria.Microorganisms · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of biological agents as weapons to disrupt established structures, such as governments and especially larger urban populations, has been prevalent throughout history. Following the anthrax letters sent to various government officials in the fall of 2001, the US has been investing in prevention, surveillance, and preparation for a potential bioterrorism attack. Additional funding authorized since 2002 has assisted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Environmental Protection Agency to invest in preventative research measures as well as preparedness programs, such as the Laboratory Response Network, Hospital Preparedness Program, and BioWatch. With both sentinel monitoring systems and epidemiological surveillance programs in place for metropolitan areas, the immediate threat of a large-scale bioterrorist attack may be limited. However, early detection is a crucial factor to initiate immediate response measures to prevent further spread following dissemination of a biological agent. Especially in rural areas, an interagency approach to train health care workers and raise awareness for the general public remain primary tasks, which is an ongoing challenge. Risk-management approaches in responding to dissemination of biological agents, as well as appropriate decontamination measures that reduce the probability of further contamination, have been provided, and suggest further investments in preparedness and surveillance. Ongoing efforts to improve preparedness and response to a bioterrorist attack are crucial to further reduce morbidity, mortality, and economic impact on public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.