ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2014
Estimation for general birth-death processes.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The probability distribution of the ancestral population size conditioned on the reconstructed phylogenetic tree with occurrence data.Journal of theoretical biology · 2021Article
- Network inference from population-level observation of epidemics.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Model-Based Detection of Whole-Genome Duplications in a Phylogeny.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Birth/birth-death processes and their computable transition probabilities with biological applications.Journal of mathematical biology · 2018Article
- Estimating dose-specific cell division and apoptosis rates from chemo-sensitivity experiments.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Social interactions among grazing reef fish drive material flux in a coral reef ecosystem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Probabilistic Modeling of Reprogramming to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Cell reports · 2016Article
- Coupling bounds for approximating birth-death processes by truncation.Statistics & probability letters · 2016Article
- Likelihood-based inference for discretely observed birth-death-shift processes, with applications to evolution of mobile genetic elements.Biometrics · 2015Article
- Efficient Transition Probability Computation for Continuous-Time Branching Processes via Compressed Sensing.Uncertainty in artificial intelligence : proceedings of the ... conference. Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · 2015Article
- SEX, LIES AND SELF-REPORTED COUNTS: BAYESIAN MIXTURE MODELS FOR HEAPING IN LONGITUDINAL COUNT DATA VIA BIRTH-DEATH PROCESSES.The annals of applied statisticsArticle
- Computational methods for birth-death processes.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statisticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Birth-death processes (BDPs) are continuous-time Markov chains that track the number of "particles" in a system over time. While widely used in population biology, genetics and ecology, statistical inference of the instantaneous particle birth and death rates remains largely limited to restrictive linear BDPs in which per-particle birth and death rates are constant. Researchers often observe the number of particles at discrete times, necessitating data augmentation procedures such as expectation-maximization (EM) to find maximum likelihood estimates. For BDPs on finite state-spaces, there are powerful matrix methods for computing the conditional expectations needed for the E-step of the EM algorithm. For BDPs on infinite state-spaces, closed-form solutions for the E-step are available for some linear models, but most previous work has resorted to time-consuming simulation. Remarkably, we show that the E-step conditional expectations can be expressed as convolutions of computable transition probabilities for any general BDP with arbitrary rates. This important observation, along with a convenient continued fraction representation of the Laplace transforms of the transition probabilities, allows for novel and efficient computation of the conditional expectations for all BDPs, eliminating the need for truncation of the state-space or costly simulation. We use this insight to derive EM algorithms that yield maximum likelihood estimation for general BDPs characterized by various rate models, including generalized linear models. We show that our Laplace convolution technique outperforms competing methods when they are available and demonstrate a technique to accelerate EM algorithm convergence. We validate our approach using synthetic data and then apply our methods to cancer cell growth and estimation of mutation parameters in microsatellite evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.