Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25328136›Full record

ArticleOncogene2015

DNMT-dependent suppression of microRNA regulates the induction of GBM tumor-propagating phenotype by Oct4 and Sox2.

H Lopez-Bertoni, B Lal, A Li, M Caplan, H Guerrero-Cázares, C G Eberhart, A Quiñones-Hinojosa, M Glas, B Scheffler, J Laterra and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Nucleic acid drug vectors for diagnosis and treatment of brain diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H Lopez-BertoniHugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, MD, USA.
B LalHugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A LiHugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, MD, USA.
M CaplanHugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, MD, USA.
H Guerrero-CázaresDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
C G EberhartDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
A Quiñones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
M GlasInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik and University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.
B SchefflerInstitute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik and University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.
J Laterra *Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Y Li *Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kennedy Krieger Institute · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction, Brain and Neurobehavioral Development in AutismP50HD103538 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI S. Ali Fatemi, Bradley L Schlaggar · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Role of NKCC1 on Brain Tumor Stem Cell Migration After EGF and Slit-2 StimulationR01NS070024 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QUINONES-HINOJOSA, ALFREDO · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
Brain Cancer Stem Cell Reprogramming by c-MetR01NS073611 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI LATERRA, JOHN J · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103538NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070024NINDS NIH HHS R01NS070024NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073611NINDS NIH HHS R01NS073611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer stem-like cells represent poorly differentiated multipotent tumor-propagating cells that contribute disproportionately to therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence. Transcriptional mechanisms that control the phenotypic conversion of tumor cells lacking tumor-propagating potential to tumor-propagating stem-like cells remain obscure. Here we show that the reprogramming transcription factors Oct4 and Sox2 induce glioblastoma cells to become stem-like and tumor-propagating via a mechanism involving direct DNA methyl transferase (DNMT) promoter transactivation, resulting in global DNA methylation- and DNMT-dependent downregulation of multiple microRNAs (miRNAs). We show that one such downregulated miRNA, miRNA-148a, inhibits glioblastoma cell stem-like properties and tumor-propagating potential. This study identifies a novel and targetable molecular circuit by which glioma cell stemness and tumor-propagating capacity are regulated.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesEpigenesis, GeneticGlioblastomaHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasm TransplantationNeoplastic Stem CellsOctamer Transcription Factor-3PhenotypeSOXB1 Transcription FactorsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesMicroRNAsMIRN148 microRNA, humanOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25328136
PMCPMC4404208
OpenAlexW2064154874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.