Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25327879›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2015

Development of brain systems for nonsymbolic numerosity and the relationship to formal math academic achievement.

Frank Haist, Jarnet H Wazny, Elizabeth Toomarian, Maha Adamo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Primitive Concepts of Number and the Developing Human Brain.Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frank HaistDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California; Center for Human Development, University of California, San Diego, California; Kavli Institute of Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, California.
Jarnet H Wazny
Elizabeth Toomarian
Maha Adamo

Funding

Development of the Functional Neural Systems for Face ExpertiseR01HD060595 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAIST, FRANK · 2009 to 2013
$2.7M
Neurobehavioral Contributors to Math Failure: A Reward-Based Learning FrameworkR24HD075489 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JERNIGAN, TERRY L. · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060595NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD075489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in cognitive and educational neuroscience is whether brain operations supporting nonlinguistic intuitive number sense (numerosity) predict individual acquisition and academic achievement for symbolic or "formal" math knowledge. Here, we conducted a developmental functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of nonsymbolic numerosity task performance in 44 participants including 14 school age children (6-12 years old), 14 adolescents (13-17 years old), and 16 adults and compared a brain activity measure of numerosity precision to scores from the Woodcock-Johnson III Broad Math index of math academic achievement. Accuracy and reaction time from the numerosity task did not reliably predict formal math achievement. We found a significant positive developmental trend for improved numerosity precision in the parietal cortex and intraparietal sulcus specifically. Controlling for age and overall cognitive ability, we found a reliable positive relationship between individual math achievement scores and parietal lobe activity only in children. In addition, children showed robust positive relationships between math achievement and numerosity precision within ventral stream processing areas bilaterally. The pattern of results suggests a dynamic developmental trajectory for visual discrimination strategies that predict the acquisition of formal math knowledge. In adults, the efficiency of visual discrimination marked by numerosity acuity in ventral occipital-temporal cortex and hippocampus differentiated individuals with better or worse formal math achievement, respectively. Overall, these results suggest that two different brain systems for nonsymbolic numerosity acuity may contribute to individual differences in math achievement and that the contribution of these systems differs across development.

Indexed as

AchievementMathematical ConceptsAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingChildChild DevelopmentDiscrimination, PsychologicalEducational StatusFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMathematicsReaction Timeacademic achievementadolescent developmentbehaviorchild developmentcognitionfunctional magnetic resonance imagingmathematicsnumber sensenumerosity

Identifiers

PMID25327879
PMCPMC4477628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.