ArticleHuman brain mapping2015
Development of brain systems for nonsymbolic numerosity and the relationship to formal math academic achievement.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tablet-based arithmetic fluency assessment reveals developments in math cognition and math achievement from childhood to adolescence.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Neural Representation Precision of Distance Predicts Children's Arithmetic Performance.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Inter-individual, hemispheric and sex variability of brain activations during numerosity processing.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Citation Network Analysis on the Influence of Vision on Academic Performance.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Domain-General Cognitive Skills in Children with Mathematical Difficulties and Dyscalculia: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Influence of eye movements on academic performance: A bibliometric and citation network analysis.Journal of eye movement research · 2022Article
- Children With Dyscalculia Show Hippocampal Hyperactivity During Symbolic Number Perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Visual Perception Supports Adults in Numerosity Processing and Arithmetical Performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- A MEG Study on the Processing of Time and Quantity: Parietal Overlap but Functional Divergence.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Fluency in symbolic arithmetic refines the approximate number system in parietal cortex.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Risk approximation in decision making: approximative numeric abilities predict advantageous decisions under objective risk.Cognitive processing · 2018Article
- Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Approximate Number System Acuity: The Role of Trial-Level and Participant-Level Characteristics.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- How do individual differences in children's domain specific and domain general abilities relate to brain activity within the intraparietal sulcus during arithmetic? An fMRI study.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
- Primitive Concepts of Number and the Developing Human Brain.Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development · 2017Article
- Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2016Article
- Dot Display Affects Approximate Number System Acuity and Relationships with Mathematical Achievement and Inhibitory Control.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central question in cognitive and educational neuroscience is whether brain operations supporting nonlinguistic intuitive number sense (numerosity) predict individual acquisition and academic achievement for symbolic or "formal" math knowledge. Here, we conducted a developmental functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of nonsymbolic numerosity task performance in 44 participants including 14 school age children (6-12 years old), 14 adolescents (13-17 years old), and 16 adults and compared a brain activity measure of numerosity precision to scores from the Woodcock-Johnson III Broad Math index of math academic achievement. Accuracy and reaction time from the numerosity task did not reliably predict formal math achievement. We found a significant positive developmental trend for improved numerosity precision in the parietal cortex and intraparietal sulcus specifically. Controlling for age and overall cognitive ability, we found a reliable positive relationship between individual math achievement scores and parietal lobe activity only in children. In addition, children showed robust positive relationships between math achievement and numerosity precision within ventral stream processing areas bilaterally. The pattern of results suggests a dynamic developmental trajectory for visual discrimination strategies that predict the acquisition of formal math knowledge. In adults, the efficiency of visual discrimination marked by numerosity acuity in ventral occipital-temporal cortex and hippocampus differentiated individuals with better or worse formal math achievement, respectively. Overall, these results suggest that two different brain systems for nonsymbolic numerosity acuity may contribute to individual differences in math achievement and that the contribution of these systems differs across development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.