Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25327613›Full record

ArticleMethods of information in medicine2015

Adaptive semantic tag mining from heterogeneous clinical research texts.

T Hao, C Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A bibliometric analysis of natural language processing in medical research.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T Hao
C WengChunhua Weng, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 W 168 Street, PH-20, New York, NY, 10032, USA, E-mail: cw2384@columbia.edu.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000040 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$26.2M
Bridging the Semantic Gap Between Research Eligibility Criteria and Clinical DataR01LM009886 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WENG, CHUNHUA · 2009 to 2020
$5.3M
Development of Major Depressive Disorder Standard Data ElementsR24FD004656 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ZOZUS, MEREDITH NAHM · 2012 to 2012
$150k
FDA HHS R24 FD004656FDA HHS R24 FD004656-01NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000040NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000040NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009886NLM NIH HHS R01LM009886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop an adaptive approach to mine frequent semantic tags (FSTs) from heterogeneous clinical research texts.

methodsWe develop a "plug-n-play" framework that integrates replaceable unsupervised kernel algorithms with formatting, functional, and utility wrappers for FST mining. Temporal information identification and semantic equivalence detection were two example functional wrappers. We first compared this approach's recall and efficiency for mining FSTs from ClinicalTrials.gov to that of a recently published tag-mining algorithm. Then we assessed this approach's adaptability to two other types of clinical research texts: clinical data requests and clinical trial protocols, by comparing the prevalence trends of FSTs across three texts.

resultsOur approach increased the average recall and speed by 12.8% and 47.02% respectively upon the baseline when mining FSTs from ClinicalTrials.gov, and maintained an overlap in relevant FSTs with the base- line ranging between 76.9% and 100% for varying FST frequency thresholds. The FSTs saturated when the data size reached 200 documents. Consistent trends in the prevalence of FST were observed across the three texts as the data size or frequency threshold changed.

conclusionsThis paper contributes an adaptive tag-mining framework that is scalable and adaptable without sacrificing its recall. This component-based architectural design can be potentially generalizable to improve the adaptability of other clinical text mining methods.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchData MiningPublicationsSemanticsAlgorithmsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMedical Informatics Computingclinical trialscomponent-based architectureMedical informaticssemantic tagstext mining

Identifiers

PMID25327613
PMCPMC4441820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.