Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25327454›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Parent's information seeking in acute childhood illness: what helps and what hinders decision making?

Sarah J Neill, Caroline H D Jones, Monica Lakhanpaul, Damian T Roland, Matthew J Thompson, ASK SNIFF research team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Qualitative Research Studies Addressing Patient-Practitioner Communication about Online Health Information.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Caring for a sick or injured child during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in 2020 in the UK: An online survey of parents' experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah J NeillSchool of Health, University of Northampton, Park Campus, Northampton, UK.
Caroline H D JonesDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
Monica LakhanpaulGeneral and Adolescent Paediatrics Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Damian T RolandPaediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic Group, Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Matthew J ThompsonDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
ASK SNIFF research team
University of Oxford · GBInstitute of Child Health · INUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Northampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAcute illness is a universal experience in early childhood. Parents find it difficult to determine whether or not their child requires medical care and seek information to inform their decision making. Little is known about parents' information seeking behaviour and what helps or hinders their decision making.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore parents' use of information resources during decision making in acute childhood illness at home. DESIGN/

methodThis exploratory qualitative study used focus groups and interviews to collect data from parents of children under 5 years of age. SETTING AND

participantsTwenty-seven parents were recruited in the East Midlands, UK, in South Asian and Gypsy/Travelling communities, a Children's Centre and a private sector day nursery.

findingsParents' pre-consultation information seeking was dominated by the internet, albeit with limited success. Parents liked easy to access, professionally validated and simple messages with access to more detailed information. Some parents always sought information through personal contact, whilst others did so when independent information seeking failed. When consulting a healthcare professional, parents liked to be given information to refer to later, although the information received varied. Importantly, neither hard copy nor the internet was accessible for parents with low levels of literacy. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsAlthough there is a wealth of information parents can access independently, our findings indicate a need for easy access to clearly signposted, professionally validated resources and available in a range of formats provided through different delivery systems. One size does not fit all.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetAcute DiseaseAdultAsiaChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsGrounded TheoryHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLiteracyMaleacute childhood illnessdecision makinginformation resourcesinformation seekingparentssafety netting

Identifiers

PMID25327454
PMCPMC5810715
OpenAlexW2113218801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.