Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25327444›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Effects of buspirone and the dopamine D3 receptor compound PG619 on cocaine and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys using a food-drug choice paradigm.

William S John, Ashwini K Banala, Amy H Newman, Michael A Nader

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Immunopharmacotherapies for Treating Opioid Use Disorder.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Chronic ΔThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William S JohnDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157-1083, USA.
Ashwini K Banala
Amy H Newman
Michael A Nader
Wake Forest University · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Novel Dopamine D3 Receptor Ligands ZIADA000424 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI NEWMAN, AMY HAUCK · 2009 to 2025
$25.9M
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGY OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007565 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRIAN A MCCOOL · 1994 to 2026
$10.1M
DOPAMINE D2 RECEPTORS IN PRIMATE MODELS OF COCAINE ABUSER01DA012460 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NADER, MICHAEL A · 2000 to 2012
$3.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA-007565NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007565NIDA NIH HHS DA012460NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe dopamine (DA) D2 and D3 receptors have been associated with cocaine abuse. A recent study with the D3 receptor (D3R) partial agonist PG619 found that it attenuated cocaine-induced reinstatement and the D2-like receptor antagonist buspirone has shown positive outcomes in two studies of cocaine abuse in monkeys. However, a recent clinical trial indicated that buspirone did not improve abstinence in treatment-seeking cocaine abusers.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to examine PG619 and buspirone under a food-drug choice paradigm in order to better model the clinical findings. In addition, we extended the characterization of both compounds to include methamphetamine (MA) self-administration (SA).

methodsSix adult male rhesus monkeys were trained to respond under a concurrent food (1.0-g pellets) and drug (0.01-0.3 mg/kg/injection cocaine or MA) choice paradigm in which complete SA dose-response curves were determined each session (N = 3/group). Monkeys received 5 days of treatment with either PG619 (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.v.) or buspirone (0.01-1.0 mg/kg, i.m.). In a follow-up study, the SA doses were reduced (0.003-0.1 mg/kg/injection) to increase reinforcement frequency and buspirone was retested.

resultsPG619 did not affect cocaine or MA choice, while buspirone increased low-dose cocaine choice. Changing the SA doses increased the number of reinforcers received each session, but buspirone did not decrease drug choice.

conclusionsConsistent with clinical findings, these results do not support the use of buspirone for psychostimulant abuse and suggest that food-drug choice paradigms may have greater predictive validity than the use of other schedules of reinforcement.

Indexed as

AnimalsBuspironeChoice BehaviorCocaineDopamine AgonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeeding BehaviorFollow-Up StudiesMacaca mulattaMaleMethamphetamineReceptors, Dopamine D3Reinforcement, PsychologySelf AdministrationBuspironeCocaineDopamine AgonistsMethamphetamineReceptors, Dopamine D3

Identifiers

PMID25327444
PMCPMC4754084
OpenAlexW2034542814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.