Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326829›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2014

Algorithms for network-based identification of differential regulators from transcriptome data: a systematic evaluation.

Hui Yu, Ramkrishna Mitra, Jing Yang, YuanYuan Li, ZhongMing Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui YuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, USA.
Ramkrishna Mitra
Jing Yang
YuanYuan Li
ZhongMing Zhao

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
TISSUE CoreP50CA098131 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO, PIETENPOL, JENNIFER A · 2003 to 2024
$48.7M
Understanding and Controlling p120 Dysfunction in CRCP50CA095103 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COFFEY, ROBERT J. · 2002 to 2017
$33.6M
Mapping the Genetic Architecture of Complex Disease via RNA-seq and GWAS DataR01LM011177 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2012 to 2014
$1.0M
Investigating MicroRNAs and Their Regulatory Networks in GlioblastomaR03CA167695 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, ZHONGMING · 2013 to 2014
$154k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P30CA68485NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095103NCI NIH HHS P50CA095103NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098131NCI NIH HHS P50CA098131NCI NIH HHS R03 CA167695NCI NIH HHS R03CA167695NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011177NLM NIH HHS R01LM011177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of differential regulators is critical to understand the dynamics of cellular systems and molecular mechanisms of diseases. Several computational algorithms have recently been developed for this purpose by using transcriptome and network data. However, it remains largely unclear which algorithm performs better under a specific condition. Such knowledge is important for both appropriate application and future enhancement of these algorithms. Here, we systematically evaluated seven main algorithms (TED, TDD, TFactS, RIF1, RIF2, dCSA_t2t, and dCSA_r2t), using both simulated and real datasets. In our simulation evaluation, we artificially inactivated either a single regulator or multiple regulators and examined how well each algorithm detected known gold standard regulators. We found that all these algorithms could effectively discern signals arising from regulatory network differences, indicating the validity of our simulation schema. Among the seven tested algorithms, TED and TFactS were placed first and second when both discrimination accuracy and robustness against data variation were considered. When applied to two independent lung cancer datasets, both TED and TFactS replicated a substantial fraction of their respective differential regulators. Since TED and TFactS rely on two distinct features of transcriptome data, namely differential co-expression and differential expression, both may be applied as mutual references during practical application.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksTranscriptomeAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualGene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanHumansLung NeoplasmsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25326829
PMCPMC4779643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.