Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326824›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2014

Role of clinical pharmacists to prevent drug interactions in cancer outpatients: a single-centre experience.

Carmen Lopez-Martin, Margarita Garrido Siles, Julia Alcaide-Garcia, Vicente Faus Felipe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Assessment of potential drug interactions in rheumatology: a comparative study of decision support software.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Development and Psychometric Validation of a Comprehensive Questionnaire to Assess Oncologists' Knowledge of Chemotherapy-Drug Interaction.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current practices, gaps, and opportunities on the role of clinical pharmacists in cancer pain management: Perspectives from Nepal.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Drug Interactions for Patients with Respiratory Diseases Receiving COVID-19 Emerged Treatments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmen Lopez-MartinPharmacy Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain, carmen_lopez_martin@hotmail.com.
Margarita Garrido Siles
Julia Alcaide-Garcia
Vicente Faus Felipe
Hospital Costa del Sol · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients are especially vulnerable to drug interactions, which may alter the efficacy and toxicity of treatment, leading to severe clinical consequences.

objectiveDetermine the incidence of such interactions in patients receiving chemotherapy, as well as to identify the drugs most frequently involved, investigate the influence of the pharmacist's interventions and verify the degree of acceptance of pharmacist's recommendations by the medical team.

settingThe oncology department of a Spanish tertiary hospital.

methodsDuring 3 months, all the drug interactions in the regular combined with treatment for cancer were analysed using two databases, and recommendations were made when clinically significant interactions (CSI) were identified.

main outcome measureIncidence of CSI in oncology outpatients; drugs involved in CSI.

resultsOf the 75 patients included, 31 (41%) presented CSI. Most interactions were among drugs included in the patient's usual treatment. The principal drug groups involved in CSI were cytostatic agents, antiemetics and antidepressants. The hospital pharmacist intervened on 20 occasions (35% of the patients presenting drug interactions). These interventions mainly focused on recommendations to modify or discontinue drug prescriptions, and were followed in 94% of cases.

conclusionThe incidence of drug interactions in cancer patients is high, and they most often involve medications to treat comorbid conditions. The pharmacist, as a member of the multidisciplinary team, can contribute significantly by checking the treatment prescribed and detecting interactions, to reduce medication-related problems and to optimise drug therapy for these patients.

Indexed as

PharmacistsProfessional RoleAgedAmbulatory CareAntineoplastic AgentsDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPharmacy Service, HospitalProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID25326824
OpenAlexW2083470029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.