Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326813›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015

Evaluation of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) as diagnostic tools of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer in Japanese women.

Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Mitsuaki Suzuki, Nobuhiro Takeshima, Ken Takizawa, Eizo Kimura, Toru Nakanishi, Kyosuke Yamada, Hirokuni Takano, Hiroshi Sasaki, Koji Koyama and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Correlation of preoperative ROMA scores with clinical stage in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Expression and diagnostic value of HE4 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki FujiwaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan, fujiwara@jichi.ac.jp.
Mitsuaki Suzuki
Nobuhiro Takeshima
Ken Takizawa
Eizo Kimura
Toru Nakanishi
Kyosuke Yamada
Hirokuni Takano
Hiroshi Sasaki
Koji Koyama
Kazunori Ochiai
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPJichi Medical University · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) have recently been shown to improve the sensitivity and specificity of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) diagnosis. We evaluated HE4 levels and ROMA as diagnostic tools of type I and type II EOC in Japanese women. Women who had a pelvic mass on imaging and were scheduled to undergo surgery were enrolled as ovarian mass patients. Serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and HE4 were tested in 319 women (131 benign, 19 borderline, 75 malignant, and 94 healthy controls). CA125, HE4, and ROMA were evaluated for sensitivity and by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) in type I and type II EOC. The results showed that, at 75% specificity, the sensitivity of CA125 and HE4 for type II was 92.1% for both markers and for type I was 51.5% and 78.8%, respectively. The sensitivities of ROMA (type I, 84.8% and type II, 97.4%) were better than those of CA125 and HE4. CA125, HE4, and ROMA were all highly accurate markers for type II. For type I, HE4 and ROMA showed better sensitivity than CA125. ROMA displayed the best diagnostic power for type I and type II including for the early stage of type I. In conclusion, HE4, CA125, and ROMA are valuable markers for type II EOC diagnosis. HE4 and ROMA analyses may improve differentiation between type I EOC and a benign mass. Measurement of combined HE4 and CA125 levels provides a more accurate method for EOC diagnosis.

Indexed as

ProteinsAdultAgedAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansJapanMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsROC CurveWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2Biomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humanProteinsWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25326813
PMCPMC4342513
OpenAlexW2079231322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.