Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326759›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA.

Werner Anderl, Leo Pauzenberger, Roman Kölblinger, Gabriele Kiesselbach, Georg Brandl, Brenda Laky, Bernhard Kriegleder, Philipp Heuberer, Eva Schwameis

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Werner AnderlDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria. werner.anderl@bhs.at.
Leo PauzenbergerDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Roman KölblingerDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriele KiesselbachDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Georg BrandlDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Brenda LakyDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard KrieglederDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp HeubererDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
Eva SchwameisDepartment of Orthopedics, St. Vincent Hospital, Stumpergasse 13, 1060, Vienna, Austria.
St Vincent Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this prospective study was to compare early clinical outcome, radiological limb alignment, and three-dimensional (3D)-component positioning between conventional and computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in primary mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

methodsTwo hundred ninety consecutive patients (300 knees) with severe, debilitating osteoarthritis scheduled for TKA were included in this study using either conventional instrumentation (CVI, n = 150) or PSI (n = 150). Patients were clinically assessed before and 2 years after surgery according to the Knee-Society-Score (KSS) and the visual-analog-scale for pain (VAS). Additionally, the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Oxford-Knee-Score (OKS) were collected at follow-up. To evaluate accuracy of CVI and PSI, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and 3D-component positioning were assessed on postoperative radiographs and CT.

resultsData of 222 knees (CVI: n = 108, PSI: n = 114) were available for analysis after a mean follow-up of 28.6 ± 5.2 months. At the early follow-up, clinical outcome (KSS, VAS, WOMAC, OKS) was comparable between the two groups. Mean HKA-deviation from the targeted neutral mechanical axis (CVI: 2.2° ± 1.7°; PSI: 1.5° ± 1.4°; p < 0.001), rates of outliers (CVI: 22.2%; PSI: 9.6%; p = 0.016), and 3D-component positioning outliers were significantly lower in the PSI group. Non-outliers (HKA: 180° ± 3°) showed better clinical results than outliers at the 2-year follow-up.

conclusionsCT-based PSI compared with CVI improves accuracy of mechanical alignment restoration and 3D-component positioning in primary TKA. While clinical outcome was comparable between the two instrumentation groups at early follow-up, significantly inferior outcome was detected in the subgroup of HKA-outliers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, Level II.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone MalalignmentFemaleHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome3D-component positioningClinical and radiological outcomeCT-based cutting blockMyKneePatient-specific instrumentationTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID25326759
OpenAlexW2041166850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.