Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326698›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2014

Hepatic toxicology following single and multiple exposure of engineered nanomaterials utilising a novel primary human 3D liver microtissue model.

Ali Kermanizadeh, Mille Løhr, Martin Roursgaard, Simon Messner, Patrina Gunness, Jens M Kelm, Peter Møller, Vicki Stone, Steffen Loft

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The potential adverse human health effects of metal-containing nanoparticles: a scoping review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chronic effects of two rutile TiOParticle and fibre toxicology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nanotoxicology and Nanosafety: Safety-By-Design and Testing at a Glance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic toxicity assessment using liver cell models: past, present, and future.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali KermanizadehDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Section of Environmental Health, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark. alke@sund.ku.dk.
Mille LøhrDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Section of Environmental Health, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark. millo@sund.ku.dk.
Martin RoursgaardDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Section of Environmental Health, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark. mwro@sund.ku.dk.
Simon MessnerInSphero AG, Wagistrasse 27, Schlieren, 8952, Switzerland. simon.messner@insphero.com.
Patrina GunnessInSphero AG, Wagistrasse 27, Schlieren, 8952, Switzerland. patrina.gunness@insphero.com.
Jens M KelmInSphero AG, Wagistrasse 27, Schlieren, 8952, Switzerland. jens.kelm@insphero.com.
Peter MøllerDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Section of Environmental Health, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark. pemo@sund.ku.dk.
Vicki StoneHeriot Watt University, School of Life Sciences, Nanosafety research group, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK. v.stone@hw.ac.uk.
Steffen LoftDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Section of Environmental Health, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark. stl@hw.ac.uk.
University College Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe liver has a crucial role in metabolic homeostasis as well as being the principal detoxification centre of the body, removing xenobiotics and waste products which could potentially include some nanomaterials (NM). With the ever increasing public and occupational exposure associated with accumulative production of nanomaterials, there is an urgent need to consider the possibility of detrimental health consequences of engineered NM exposure. It has been shown that exposure via inhalation, intratracheal instillation or ingestion can result in NM translocation to the liver. Traditional in vitro or ex vivo hepatic nanotoxicology models are often limiting and/or troublesome (i.e. reduced metabolism enzymes, lacking important cell populations, unstable with very high variability, etc.).

methodsIn order to rectify these issues and for the very first time we have utilised a 3D human liver microtissue model to investigate the toxicological effects associated with a single or multiple exposure of a panel of engineered NMs (Ag, ZnO, MWCNT and a positively charged TiO₂).

resultsHere we demonstrate that the repeated exposure of the NMs is more damaging to the liver tissue as in comparison to a single exposure with the adverse effects more significant following treatment with the Ag and ZnO as compared with the TiO₂ and MWCNT NMs (in terms of cytotoxicity, cytokine secretion, lipid peroxidation and genotoxicity).

conclusionsOverall, this study demonstrates that the human microtissue model utilised herein is an excellent candidate for replacement of traditional in vitro single cell hepatic models and further progression of liver nanotoxicology.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDNA DamageCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesCytokinesHepatocytesHumansLipid PeroxidationLiverMetal NanoparticlesMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanostructuresNanotubes, CarbonOxidative StressSerum AlbuminSerum Albumin, HumanALB protein, humanCytokinesNanotubes, CarbonSerum AlbuminSerum Albumin, HumanSilverTitaniumtitanium dioxideZinc Oxide

Identifiers

PMID25326698
PMCPMC4207326
OpenAlexW2102244990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.