Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326691›Full record

Trial reportNature neuroscience2014

Mind matters: placebo enhances reward learning in Parkinson's disease.

Liane Schmidt, Erin Kendall Braun, Tor D Wager, Daphna Shohamy

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Frontal-Brainstem Pathways Mediating Placebo Effects on Social Rejection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making and Subjective Well-Being.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Social information creates self-fulfilling prophecies in judgments of pain, vicarious pain, and cognitive effort.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unpacking placebo and working memory training effects on cognitive performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Aberrant Striatal Value Representation in Huntington's Disease Gene Carriers 25 Years Before Onset.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liane SchmidtPsychology Department, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Erin Kendall BraunPsychology Department, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Tor D WagerPsychology Department, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Daphna Shohamy1] Psychology Department, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. [2] Kavli Center for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

The Neural Bases of Placebo Effects and their Relation to Regulatory ProcessesR01MH076136 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2007 to 2023
$8.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076136NIMH NIH HHS R01MH076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expectations have a powerful influence on how we experience the world. Neurobiological and computational models of learning suggest that dopamine is crucial for shaping expectations of reward and that expectations alone may influence dopamine levels. However, because expectations and reinforcers are typically manipulated together, the role of expectations per se has remained unclear. We separated these two factors using a placebo dopaminergic manipulation in individuals with Parkinson's disease. We combined a reward learning task with functional magnetic resonance imaging to test how expectations of dopamine release modulate learning-related activity in the brain. We found that the mere expectation of dopamine release enhanced reward learning and modulated learning-related signals in the striatum and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. These effects were selective to learning from reward: neither medication nor placebo had an effect on learning to avoid monetary loss. These findings suggest a neurobiological mechanism by which expectations shape learning and affect.

Indexed as

RewardAgedAged, 80 and overAntiparkinson AgentsFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseasePhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexThinkingAntiparkinson Agents

Identifiers

PMID25326691
PMCPMC4503317
OpenAlexW2054358775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.