Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326296›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Comparisons of ectomycorrhizal colonization of transgenic american chestnut with those of the wild type, a conventionally bred hybrid, and related fagaceae species.

Katherine M D'Amico, Thomas R Horton, Charles A Maynard, Stephen V Stehman, Allison D Oakes, William A Powell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perspectives of Gene Editing for the Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine M D'AmicoDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Thomas R HortonDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Charles A MaynardDepartment of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Stephen V StehmanDepartment of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Allison D OakesDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA.
William A PowellDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, USA wapowell@esf.edu.
York University · USState University of New York · USSUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American chestnut (Castanea dentata [Marsh.] Borkh.) dominated the eastern forests of North America, serving as a keystone species both ecologically and economically until the introduction of the chestnut blight, Cryphonectria parasitica, functionally eradicated the species. Restoration efforts include genetic transformation utilizing genes such as oxalate oxidase to produce potentially blight-resistant chestnut trees that could be released back into the native range. However, before such a release can be undertaken, it is necessary to assess nontarget impacts. Since oxalate oxidase is meant to combat a fungal pathogen, we are particularly interested in potential impacts of this transgene on beneficial fungi. This study compares ectomycorrhizal fungal colonization on a transgenic American chestnut clone expressing enhanced blight resistance to a wild-type American chestnut, a conventionally bred American-Chinese hybrid chestnut, and other Fagaceae species. A greenhouse bioassay used soil from two field sites with different soil types and land use histories. The number of colonized root tips was counted, and fungal species were identified using morphology, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and DNA sequencing. Results showed that total ectomycorrhizal colonization varied more by soil type than by tree species. Individual fungal species varied in their colonization rates, but there were no significant differences between colonization on transgenic and wild-type chestnuts. This study shows that the oxalate oxidase gene can increase resistance against Cryphonectria parasitica without changing the colonization rate for ectomycorrhizal species. These findings will be crucial for a potential deregulation of blight-resistant American chestnuts containing the oxalate oxidase gene.

Indexed as

DNA, FungalFagaceaeMolecular Sequence DataMycorrhizaeOxidoreductasesPlant RootsPlants, Genetically ModifiedPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRecombinant ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Fungaloxalate oxidaseOxidoreductasesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25326296
PMCPMC4272724
OpenAlexW2001117156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.