ArticleGenetics2014
Estimation of epistatic variance components and heritability in founder populations and crosses.
Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laboratory yeast crosses reveal limited epistasis in the genetic basis of complex traits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Estimation of indirect genetic effects and heritability under assortative mating.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Open problems in human trait genetics.Genome biology · 2022Review
- A model and test for coordinated polygenic epistasis in complex traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Neighbor GWAS: incorporating neighbor genotypic identity into genome-wide association studies of field herbivory.Heredity · 2021Article
- Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Detecting the dominance component of heritability in isolated and outbred human populations.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Relatedness disequilibrium regression estimates heritability without environmental bias.Nature genetics · 2018Article
- Article
- Detecting epistasis with the marginal epistasis test in genetic mapping studies of quantitative traits.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- The Human Microbiome and the Missing Heritability Problem.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
- Powerful decomposition of complex traits in a diploid model.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Review
- Predicting quantitative traits from genome and phenome with near perfect accuracy.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Genetic interactions contribute less than additive effects to quantitative trait variation in yeast.Nature communications · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic association studies have explained only a small proportion of the estimated heritability of complex traits, leaving the remaining heritability "missing." Genetic interactions have been proposed as an explanation for this, because they lead to overestimates of the heritability and are hard to detect. Whether this explanation is true depends on the proportion of variance attributable to genetic interactions, which is difficult to measure in outbred populations. Founder populations exhibit a greater range of kinship than outbred populations, which helps in fitting the epistatic variance. We extend classic theory to founder populations, giving the covariance between individuals due to epistasis of any order. We recover the classic theory as a limit, and we derive a recently proposed estimator of the narrow sense heritability as a corollary. We extend the variance decomposition to include dominance. We show in simulations that it would be possible to estimate the variance from pairwise interactions with samples of a few thousand from strongly bottlenecked human founder populations, and we provide an analytical approximation of the standard error. Applying these methods to 46 traits measured in a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cross, we estimate that pairwise interactions explain 10% of the phenotypic variance on average and that third- and higher-order interactions explain 14% of the phenotypic variance on average. We search for third-order interactions, discovering an interaction that is shared between two traits. Our methods will be relevant to future studies of epistatic variance in founder populations and crosses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.