ArticleFood and environmental virology2015
Concentration of enteric viruses in large volumes of water using a cartridge-type mixed cellulose ester membrane.
Article in Food and environmental virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- NanoRidge filters: Fabrication strategies and performance optimization for nano-scale microfluidic particle filtration.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Article
- A review on detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater in light of the current knowledge of treatment process for removal of viral fragments.Journal of environmental management · 2021Review
- Evaluation of a bioaerosol sampler for indoor environmental surveillance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.PloS one · 2021Article
- Primary concentration - The critical step in implementing the wastewater based epidemiology for the COVID-19 pandemic: A mini-review.The Science of the total environment · 2020Review
- A Review of the Most Commonly Used Methods for Sample Collection in Environmental Surveillance of Poliovirus.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018Review
- Evaluation of Virus Reduction by Ultrafiltration with Coagulation-Sedimentation in Water Reclamation.Food and environmental virology · 2017Article
- Detection of Human Enteric Viruses in Freshwater from European Countries.Food and environmental virology · 2016Article
- Organic substances interfere with reverse transcription-quantitative PCR-based virus detection in water samples.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A viral adsorption-elution method using a flat/disk-type electronegative membrane (diameter of 47-90 mm) has been widely utilized to concentrate viruses in relatively small volumes of water (up to 10 L) due to limited filtration area. In the present study, we aimed to develop a virus concentration method that is based on the same principle and yet allows concentration of large volumes of water using a cartridge-type electronegative membrane. We modified two electronegative membrane-based methods for this purpose (i.e., Mg(2+) method and Al(3+) method) and determined recovery efficiencies of poliovirus and murine norovirus inoculated in water samples. The virus recovery efficiency of the Al(3+) method substantially decreased as the volume of water sample increased. In contrast, Mg(2+) method showed stable virus recovery efficiencies (10-54 %) even when 40 to 1,000 L of river and tap water samples were processed. The volume of the concentrate (400 mL) can be further reduced to 1.5 mL by a Centricon plus-70 centrifugal ultrafiltration device with overall recovery efficiencies of 8.8-16 %. Our results demonstrated that the newly developed virus concentration method enables detection of as low as 10(1) copies/L of viruses in water samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25326201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.