Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326161›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2014

Expanding public-private collaborations to enhance cancer drug development: a report of the Institute of Medicine's workshop series, "Implementing a National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century".

Monica M Bertagnolli, Renzo Canetta, Sharyl J Nass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica M BertagnolliDana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA; National Cancer Policy Forum, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., USA mbertagnolli@partners.org.
Renzo CanettaDana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA; National Cancer Policy Forum, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., USA.
Sharyl J NassDana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA; National Cancer Policy Forum, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their inception in the 1950s, the National Cancer Institute-funded cancer cooperative groups have been important contributors to cancer clinical and translational research. In 2010, a committee appointed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences completed a consensus review on the status of the U.S. publicly funded cancer clinical trials system. This report identified a need to reinvigorate the cooperative groups and provided recommendations for improving their effectiveness. Follow-up workshops to monitor progress were conducted by the IOM's National Cancer Policy Forum and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in 2011 and 2013. One of the key recommendations of the IOM report was a call for greater collaboration among stakeholders in cancer research. In particular, more active engagement and better alignment of incentives among the cooperative groups, the National Cancer Institute, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the biopharmaceutical industry were identified as essential to achieving the promise of oncology drug development. This review, based on presentations and discussion during the IOM-ASCO workshops, outlines the progress and remaining challenges of these collaborations.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicDrug DiscoveryHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Public-Private Sector PartnershipsSocieties, ScientificTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited StatesAntineoplastic AgentsClinical trialsDrug developmentInstitute of MedicineNational Cancer Institute

Identifiers

PMID25326161
PMCPMC4221375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.