Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326155›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2015

Current concepts of oxygen therapy in neonates.

Siddarth Ramji, Ola D Saugstad, Ashish Jain

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Editorial: Advances in neonatology--III.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Siddarth RamjiDepartment of Neonatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, 110002, India, siddarthramji@gmail.com.
Ola D Saugstad
Ashish Jain
Maulana Azad Medical College · INUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of high oxygen concentrations in treating neonatal illness has been challenged in the past few decades. In the face of evidence suggesting adverse outcomes (both clinical and biochemical) with use of high oxygen concentrations, the current guidelines appear to favour use of the lowest possible concentrations of oxygen for the shortest time to treat ill neonates. Current delivery room guidelines recommend using room air when initiating positive pressure ventilation during resuscitation. Targeting appropriate oxygen saturation when delivering supplemental oxygen, both in the delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), are now the new emerging standards in neonatal care. Investments in good quality pulse oximeters and oxygen blenders in neonatal care units is now seen as critical to improve newborn survival.

Indexed as

Infant, Newborn, DiseasesOxygen Inhalation TherapyDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInfant, NewbornOximetryPractice Guidelines as TopicResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID25326155
OpenAlexW1971919541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.