Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25326141›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2014

Predialysis education in practice: a questionnaire survey of centres with established programmes.

Mario Prieto-Velasco, Corinne Isnard Bagnis, Jessica Dean, Tony Goovaerts, Stefan Melander, Andrew Mooney, Eva-Lena Nilsson, Peter Rutherford, Carmen Trujillo, Roberto Zambon and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Results of the European EDITH nephrologist survey on factors influencing treatment modality choice for end-stage kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mario Prieto-VelascoUnidad de Nefrología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain. mprietov@gmail.com.
Corinne Isnard Bagnis
Jessica Dean
Tony Goovaerts
Stefan Melander
Andrew Mooney
Eva-Lena Nilsson
Peter Rutherford
Carmen Trujillo
Roberto Zambon
Carlo Crepaldi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing evidence that renal replacement therapy option education (RRTOE) can result in enhanced quality of life, improved clinical outcomes, and reduced health care costs. However, there is still no detailed guidance on the optimal way to run such programmes. To help address this knowledge gap, an expert meeting was held in March 2013 to formulate a position statement on optimal ways to run RRTOE. Experts were selected from units that had extensive experience in RRTOE or were performing research in this field. Before the meeting, experts completed a pilot questionnaire on RRTOE in their own units. They also prepared feedback on how to modify this questionnaire for a large-scale study.

methodsA pilot, web-based questionnaire was used to obtain information on: the renal unit and patients, the education team, RRTOE processes and content, how quality is assessed, and funding.

resultsFour nurses, 5 nephrologists and 1 clinical psychologist (9 renal units; 6 EU countries) participated. Nurses were almost always responsible for organising RRTOE. Nephrologists spent 7.5% (median) of their time on RRTOE. Education for the patient and family began several months before dialysis or according to disease progression. Key topics such as the 'impact of the disease' were covered by every unit, but only a few units described all dialysis modalities. Visits to the unit were almost always arranged. Materials came in a wide variety of forms and from a wide range of sources. Group education sessions were used in 3/9 centres. Expectations on the timing of patients' decisions on modality and permanent access differed substantially between centres. Common quality assurance measures were: patient satisfaction, course attendance, updated materials. Only 1 unit had a dedicated budget.

conclusionsThere were substantial variations in how RRTOE is run between the units. A modified version of this questionnaire will be used to assess RRTOE at a European level.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Care TeamPatient Education as TopicRenal DialysisEuropeHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHumansNephrologyPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Program DevelopmentQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareRenal Insufficiency, Chronic

Identifiers

PMID25326141
PMCPMC4210595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.