Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25325952›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2015

Capillary electrophoretic analysis of isolated sulfated polysaccharides to characterize pharmaceutical products.

Zachary Shriver, Ram Sasisekharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary ShriverDepartment of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute of Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Ram Sasisekharan

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI YAFFE, MICHAEL B · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
Structure-Function Relationship of GlycosaminoglycansR37GM057073 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SASISEKHARAN, RAM · 2010 to 2019
$3.9M
Sequence Analysis of GlycosaminoglycansR01GM057073 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SASISEKHARAN, RAM · 1998 to 2010
$3.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057073NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM057073-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis is a powerful methodology for quantification and structural characterization of highly anionic polysaccharides. Separation of saccharides under conditions of electrophoretic flow, typically achieved under low pH (Ampofo et al., Anal Biochem 199:249-255, 1991; Rhomberg et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:4176-4181, 1998), is charge-based. Resolution of components is often superior to flow-based techniques, such as liquid chromatography. During the heparin contamination crisis, capillary electrophoresis was one of the key methodologies used to identify whether or not heparin lots were contaminated (Guerrini et al., Nat Biotechnol 26:669-675, 2008). Here we describe a method for isolation of sulfated heparin/heparan sulfate saccharides from urine, their digestion by deployment of heparinase enzymes (Ernst et al., Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 30:387-444, 1995), resolution of species through use of orthogonal digestions, and analysis of the resulting disaccharides by capillary electrophoresis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleDisaccharidesElectrophoresis, CapillaryHeparan SulfateHeparinHeparin LyaseHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsReference StandardsDisaccharidesHeparan SulfateHeparinHeparin LyasePharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID25325952
PMCPMC5460761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.